What a wild time to be alive

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was imaging this meme just last week, while my wife finished renewing her Italian passport and stuffing a bugout bag full of Euros.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean, the cycle started with the implementation of capitalism. Italy was functionally feudalistic (particularly in the southern territories) until the mid-19th century, with state power relegated to a hodgepodge of principalities. It’s only really been a unified country since 1870 and lagged on industrialization until the Cold War Era, when the US Marshall Plan made it an industrial and shipping beachhead for NATO-bloc manufacturing and trade (as well as a military base to strike out at North Africa and the Middle East).

      The waves of Italian immigrants weren’t fleeing capitalism. They were fleeing the two World Wars and the industrial collapse of Europe. Americans, by contrast, won’t experience the same immediate socio-economic pressures to leave. So I suspect a lot of the reverse-migration we’ll see to Italy will be coming from an American wealthy middle class seeking to retire into a post-industrial retirement playground rather than an Italian underclass seeking gainful employment and safety from chronic civil wars and invasions.

      Italy is going to be more like Florida in the 1990s than New Jersey in the 1920s.

    • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      What would be the alternative? Socialism and thus the standstill of further development? It would have to be extremely state-regulated capitalism. But above all taxes! So on the rich. Democracies would have to be able to protect their own form of government… but they didn’t think about it when they were founded because everyone was happy about the positive outcome. So that our democracies are attacked from within. Above all, America needed to regulate tech companies more. Tax havens should be prevented, etc. Capitalism itself promotes further development. It just needs to be protected from abuse. Private individuals should never have too much money and therefore automatically have power.

        • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If the state controls everything and resources etc. are distributed fairly, there is no competition.

          “Where capitalism promotes efficiency, socialism focuses on equality and solidarity, a redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor and the creation and maintenance of a level playing field”

          Equality excludes the whole thing from the outset ( developing ). It would ultimately end in unequality.

          That’s why it would have to be ( now it’s getting funny ) socialist capitalism.

          Edit: State capitalism e.g. Scandinavia. Would you now say that the people there are in a bad way?

          • kaaskop@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Please note that there is a distinct difference between socialism and communism. You seem to be describing communism. Within a socialistic system there is still the concept of rich and poor and there is still the ability to create a better life through the effort of development. This specifically is the key distinction between socialism and capitalism.

            So what you’re calling “socialist capitalism” turns out (funnily enough) to be just socialism which is in turn a capitalistic communism. :)

            • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Btw, I have listed the reasons why things are currently failing in the West.

              It would have to be extremely state-regulated capitalism (because of people like Musk,Bezos,Zuckerberg etc for example).

              But above all: taxes! So on the rich. (So that taxes are distributed more fairly and, above all, the working class is relieved. In other words, taxes should go up and not down.
              So that knowledge is not poached from friendly countries through low taxes. So that the state itself earns financially, which could ultimately be distributed fairly)

              Democracies should be able to protect their own form of government… but they didn’t think about that when they were founded because everyone was happy about the positive outcome. So our democracies are under attack from within. ( So that the far right or far left can’t take over. Or can be destabilized by external influences. )

              Above all, America should regulate tech companies more. ( No spying on citizens and such. No mass theft of intellectual property etc )

              Tax havens should be prevented, etc( Because it enables tax evasion and other negative effects)

              It just needs to be protected from abuse. Private individuals should never have too much money and therefore automatically power. ( Well, we can see the result if it is not protected in America. )

              For example, I didn’t say a word about citizens holding power over the state. (Which of course should be the case)

      • sunflowercowboy@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        No the uber rich creat discomfort, the rich would instead move than rectify it with their weight.

        It’s why theyre able to run, and the meek must inherit their suffering. Too afraid to live and face the adversity.

        The meek have no choice but to inherit the pain you abandoned and rise. Why do you think europe is capable of being ran to? The people stayed and worked it.

        Only the rich think you can run from tyranny, and only the meek know what it means to submit without wanting. Bloodshed will be regardless, but good men fear to lose their right and bad men hope to gain righteousness.

        Do something more than coward is my mentality.

        Lazy men want comfort in homes of others, honorable folk build their structure and stability.

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Uruguay has a pretty easy system you can make a request of residence and it seems that usually go through. Americans do not need a visa to come but if you prepare the paperwork is easier…

      • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        A quick scan of Wikipedia shows there’s an actual left wing party currently in power that was formerly led by a guerilla fighter during the military occupation of the country in the 80s

        As well they legalized abortions in 2012 and weed and same sex marriage in 2013

        It’s got a 3 branch government similar to America

        Economy seems stable, Internet seems good.

        Guess it’s time to start learning Portuguese or Spanish!

        • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          The left wing party is not led by a former guerrila fighter but said one Jose Mujica was president yes here the president is important yes but not the all powerful figure. That was in the 70s (the guerrilla thing) and they all admitted that doing a revolution was not the best answer to the political trumoil. Also the militia coup was backed by Nixon so there is that.

          And it’s Spanish the official language.

          • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I did say formerly. The first president of the current party was a guerilla fighter.

            Do you mean the military leadership of the 80s was backed by Nixon or the group that overthrew them?

            • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              The guerrilla in fact failed to overthrow them when Reagan came and pulled out the cord all dictatorship regimes started falling like dominoes. This one especially felt that they could get the peaceful way out and they did a referendum they lost by a wide margin and they stepped down. Now the guerrilla group formed a coalition with other left leaning groups and they made the Frente Amplio (translates to “wide front”) and that’s why I made the distiction of being the president and led as they are a coalition the direction they take is usually decided by the “plenario” which is an internal gathering where they debate vote and decide, so they have an internal president but they act more of an organizer rather than the decision makers. It’s not a perfect system but well it works in it’s own way. IMO FA is more like the French Socialist party and the Japanese LDP rather than the US democrats. The good news for fediverse ppl is that they are very pro queer and progressive. Also they are very pro democracy in fact the dictatorship regime here is considered a far right one.

              • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Good to know! Also, couple questions I’d you don’t mind -

                How’s the Internet down there? What’s the overall opinion/ government policy on trans people? Lastly, how’s the tech job market (if you know)?

      • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Best option on Latin America on pretty much any standard. Progressive laws, good weather - main negative thing I can think of is that rent can be quite expensive. I’ve considered moving there in the past but my Spanish is awful.

        • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pretty on point really although there are some govt initatives to help. Hell in enough ppl comes over at once you can start a cooperative and build your own houses. Also the mayority speaks some basics almost 15% of ppl speaks first level English with a 5% that basically manages complete. Many places do have English speaking personnel even.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      The far-right in Europe seems to have lost momentum a bit-- for now. The far-right parties in government in Sweden and Netherlands proved themselves incompetent and lost support. The support on German AfD stagnated. Meloni has shown to be more moderate than expected (well, not quite but that’s a long story). And Le Pen has been prosecuted, but I think this is not enough to actually kill the French far-right movement so long as the French government still practice neoliberal policies. But I think the major factor that made Europeans think twice now about gravitating towards fascism is after witnessing the shit show in America and Musk’s overt election interference in Europe. I should not be laughing, but what a laugh the three months of Trump administration has been!

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I will be honest, I thought that Trump will continue with his fascist-adjacent/fascist-lite policies from his first term. Looks like in this term, he is out for vengeance and doubled down!

    • fin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      As a Japanese, I think Japan has always been a fascists’ country. The flavor of nazism did change from German one to American one after WW2, though

      • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Like plenty countries, but it only becomes a problem when it’s also against whites.

        • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fascists on the rise in Australia too sadly. New Zealand is very isolationist and anti immigration.

            • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Would be ironic if we had to go to Africa because life there is better.

              … after decades of relentlessly repeating how much better we have it that “poor children in africa” especially.

              • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 days ago

                There’s a great show about families going there for a better life from here. It’s called coming from America. Worth a watch. Not everything is perfect there but people from here can own land and feel free.

              • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Africa is beautiful, the only issue is safety.

                Countries like namibia/botswana probably have less of these issues as well.

              • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s exactly my plan C if the lunatics start WW3 suddenly.
                Reachable from Europe and less likely to explode.
                But I hope to find a perfect spot before that in an organised way.

            • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Those nice people made a fascist president there not too long ago.
              (He also made sure there was a lot less forest)

              • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, but who doesn’t have fascists? At least they’re prosecuting theirs. Bolsonaro can’t stand for elections no more.

                So, at least they’re back to the status quo, where they destroy the planet slowly.

                • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  True, but I was surprised tho when I first heard of him and his succes.
                  “Brazil? The smiley samba sunshine people where most people aren’t even white voting for a fascist?”

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a respectful xenophobia though. Like, it’s just as bad but entirely Japanese in flavor. If I had to make a ham fisted metaphor.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I always see xenophobia and racism as different level in the same category. Like, the former is “milder” and something as I, as an immigrant, could overlook. The latter is far more hateful and intolerant.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      As someone who lives in Japan, I’ve got some bad news for you…

      The good news is that it’s mostly just the olds. The bad news is that it isn’t exclusively just the older generations.

    • nico198X@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      still, EU countries have far superior electoral systems than the US to help mitigate the rise and influence of Fascism.

      • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        They even have multiple parties and an Overton window wider than only right to extreme-right!

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That is if the other parties aren’t largely complicit. Looking at you Germany, Denmark, France, Finland, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Poland, Hungary…

        • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          True, same is now happening with those awful US dems.
          Already tone-deaf before the election, saying they just needed to accept the uncomfortable genocide support or get Trump.
          Now they want to beat him by “embracing patriotism” “banning left wing voices” and other horrible Trump style measures.
          A race to the bottom.

          • win95@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Which is weird when you see the IRL support and hype around Bernie and AOC. The people want more left in the democratic party.

            • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              They are the imaginary left and selling the snake oil of curing the party from within.
              That party is sponsored by most of the same oligarchs, companies, banks and the MIC.
              It can never happen.
              And especially now with Trump the people can be easily manipulated to funnel their anger towards him while keeping the Dems safe.

            • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I guess the meaning of racism got lost in the way

              But yea besides, anyone who watched some Japanese content knows that it’s a recurrent theme. I guess you’re just all turning a blind eye on this subject. Calling a whole continent fascist is alright but calling Japan a country of pedophiles isn’t… (jokingly, ofc, we all know ALL Japanese are not like this, the majority aren’t (I hope))

              Double standards people. But seriously, I think this subject can be talked about. I would much rather prefer someone proving me wrong than to be censored as a “racist”, which is baseless.

              • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                You literally said you “view the population”, as in everyone, a certain way based on this.

                You then admitted it’s not the majority.

                That’s about as racist as you can get.

                Calling a country fascist for having fascist people in power is not the same thing.

                • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Sorry for not being clear on this subject. I thought people would get it.

                  If you think that’s the most racist thing that exists, I can’t help you. Re-check your definitions

                  Its in the line of the original stereotypes used for humor. It gets bad when you take it seriously. Much like “if you go to school in the USA you’ll get shot” or shit like that. Exaggerations that point out something. Wasn’t meant to be discriminating in any way, sorry if took like that.

                  There must be countries where this issue (pedophilia) is way more real. I’m only pointing this out as the Japanese media I know often trivializes this subject and it shocks me.

              • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                We call America fascist because its government is. That doesn’t say anything about the people who live there. Calling North Korea a tyranny doesn’t make every one of its citizens a tyrant.

                Calling Japan “a country of pedophiles” is generalising to the whole population and therefore racist. No double standards there. And it’s not just because loli exists that they have more pedophilia than western countries do.

                • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Generalizing to the whole population isn’t called racism. About the other thing, I already made it clear it was a stereotype, and as such, not my true belief. Still, I think it’s worth noting.

                  I do think there’s more pedophilia there based on the fact that more media depict it and people aren’t really grossed out by it. I might be wrong though, I’m not basing myself on any fact, just intuition (except that iirc they had some problems with laws not being harsh enough on this subject)

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Not pedophiles; ephebophiles. Still gross, but adults remember their sexual awakenings and early experiences around the same time so it’s at least reflective of life experience. However, if you’re in late 20s and older and jerking off with your waifu pillow you should seek help

            • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              New word learned! Thanks :)

              It’s often that yea, but there’s a lot of pedophilia in media as well (lolis, or animes that flat out states characters are under 15 yo and are sexually active (with older people))

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Depends on your viewpoint.

        Emigrate from Europe and immigrate to Europe is also a valid way to look at it.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        According to Etymonline,

        Immigrate = in- “into, in, on, upon” from PIE root *en + migrare “to move” from PIE root *mei

        Emigrate = assimilated form of ex- “out” from PIE root *eghs + migrare “to move” from PIE root *mei

        So I guess to correct usage would be:

        Immigrating to Europe/US

        Emigrating from US/Europe

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It depends on where you’re speaking from.

          If you’re in the US, people were immigrating from Europe and to the US and are now emigrating to Europe and from the US.

          If you’re in Europe, people were emigrating from Europe and to the US and are now immigrating to Europe and from the US.

          Easiest solution is to say migrating :)

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            people were immigrating from Europe

            The linguistically correct term her would be emigrating from Europe.

            to the US

            This is immigrating.

            emigrating to Europe

            This is immigration.

            from the US

            The word you’re looking for is emigration.

            emigrating from Europe

            You’re correct here.

            to the US

            Once again, immigration.

            immigrating to Europe

            This is the linguistically correct use of the term.

            from the US

            Proper word would be emigrating.

            Easiest solution is to say migrating

            Migration by itself doesn’t indicate whether you’re referring to domestic-only movement, where people migrate inside of a country, or domestic-to-foreign where they cross a border, or foreign-to-foreign movement.

            It all depends on the boundary you set.

            If your chosen boundary is Europe, people moving to Europe are immigrating there, and people moving from Europe are emigrating there.

            If your chosen boundary is the US, immigration is moving to the US while emigration is moving from the US.

            Since migration isn’t specific and can refer to any of the above cases, I prefer transmigration since “trans-” refers to “across” which I often interpret as “out from and in to”.

            We don’t need to give up on prepositions in order to have more accurate language.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              This is way too confusing for me to follow but it sounds vaguely like we mean the same thing.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      i think you use “emigrating” when leaving their homes behind, but here it is part of the joke that they no longer see the US as their home. instead, they’re seeing europe/whatever other country as their new “home”, so they’re immigrating.

      • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do you imagine some kind of deeper meaning wrapped in a joke in it?
        The more likely explanation is that plenty Americans have poor literacy.
        Even plenty of ‘their’ ‘there’ mistakes. Elemental English.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just my two cents, not having a go at you:

      This is why I’m a pragmatic prescriptivist, I want people to follow norms for ease of communication, unless their innovation fills a need/fixes something about the language.

      Stupid english with its stupid verbs.

      We’ve got “to” and “from” why do we need to have two differently spelt verbs for basically the same thing.

      Sure, you could argue that you can just say “they are emigrating” to imply people are leaving the country permanently, but let’s be honest, not providing any other context it’s practically unheard of. You’ll at least be saying where they currently are, came from, or going to, unless you’re being very abstract. Even then, you couls say “the migrants were immigrating” to be very vague about it. Both immigrating and emigrating involve moving, wtf is the point?

      I’m glad few people “properly” use “emigrate” these days. Let’s kill it, it’s redundant!

      I may have even gotten the difference wrong, but I’m not gonna look it up since I don’t want to use it anyway haha

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I, personally, like a language being rich. Nothing wrong with not knowing all the ins and outs, but calling for simplification on what is already an very simple language is odd.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I wouldn’t call English simple haha

          To me the richness comes from interesting cultural quirks of why we say something, but I’m not really feeling that for emigrate, personally, so would prefer we speed up it being forgotten. Words falling out of use is very common, so I’m happy to lose ones that are annoying

          I should also specify, I’m just getting into the spirit of enjoyable nitpicking, also

        • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          In my view, “migrate” according to Etymonline originates from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *mei which means “to change, go, move”.

          I don’t believe this term refers to moving in or out of something, or any other preposition.

          As we’ve been discussing in this post, immigrate and emigrate represent inverses of each other. It makes sense to look for logical ways to combine those.

          I think the best prefix for this would be trans- for, according to Etymonline, this means “across, beyond, through, on the other side of; go beyond”. Specifically, I would refer to trans- as meaning “out from and in to”, which gives us the word “transmigrate”. Etymonline has a dictionary entry for “transmigration”.

          It looks like Merriam-Webster, Oxford, and American Heritage dictionaries support “transmigrate” as an entry.

          • scholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            From wiktionary: Verb migrate (third-person singular simple present migrates, present participle migrating, simple past and past participle migrated)

            (intransitive) To change habitations across a border; to move from one country or political region to another. To escape persecution, they migrated to a neutral country.

            This is already common usage and I don’t see the need for any prefixes to the word. The Etymonline definition is giving the definition of the root, not the current english word.

            • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is already common usage and I don’t see the need for any prefixes to the word.

              As we’ve already seen in this thread, sometimes prefixes are needed to help establish the arrow of causation when people do migrate. Did they come to or leave from this or that country? Etc.

              not the current english word.

              Good thing language can change over time :)

              • scholar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                The problem we’re addressing is that the prefixes are made redundant by the syntax of to and from. ‘immigrating to europe’ ‘emmigrating from europe’. Dropping the prefix in this context doesn’t change the meaning: ‘migrating to europe’ ‘migrating from europe’.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think there’s a richness in being able to shift or emphasize perspective like that. And a poetry, for want of a better word, that comes with that.

        ‘Coming’ and ‘going’ do the same shift. “I’m coming to Europe; they’re coming from Europe,” feels just a bit stilted to me, though that’s subjective I suppose.

        If you want to get rid of immigrate Vs emigrate, maybe we just talk about ‘migrate’.

        And scrap ‘coming’ and ‘going’ for ‘moving’.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because when you’re the one who “came up” with it, it’s usually a pretty sweet ride, provided you can weather the revolutions and stuff.

      • parody
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ooooh sorry weathering revolutions isn’t part of our Fascism ‘25 package - that was extra :-/

        Would you be interested in our selection of neck guards?

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I blame the French, before them damned near every Germanic society had a broadly democratic tribal or clan based system. Then the French combined that with Roman autocratic systems and somehow created an early version of Divine right of kings and a form of proto absolutism. Yes I am glossing over a tonne of shit but compare the French estates to the clusterfuck that was the Holy Roman Diet and it’s like comparing a member of the English Royal guard to a Somalian pirate.

          • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well, if you really wanna get into it, I blame the Romans. It was their colonialism and influence that made the region of the Franks what it was culturally. Then their collapse created a power vacuum allowing this remnant territory to rise and fill it, wanting to be its own new Rome (like almost every other empire that arose after that). And on and on until today. Colonialism and imperialism is a cancer that has been growing and growing through the ages to get us to where we are today

    • sillyplasm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      what ever happened to respecting your fellow humans and treating them as people?

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      i have come to the conclusion that there is a god and a heaven, alright, but it’s a cruel place that i would never ever ever want to go to. ever

      edit: oh yeah, what does that have to do with your comment? well, the christians are going to heaven alright, if you can interpret the american technocracy (or even mars) as “heaven” (by any stretch of the word)

      explanation: the christian idea of “heaven” is heavily based on platon’s “ideas”, which are described as “heavenly objects” (a.k.a abstractions), and platon called the collection of all ideas the “inter-net” for some reason, and modern IT is heavily modeled after it, with a purely abstract world ruling the world, more or less. there’s lots of articles how some technological platforms (such as meta, google) shaping what news we get and what we believe/think. thus it is a “techno-cracy”.

  • Hikuro93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Europe accepts its sons and daughters of long ago. Specially the talented ones who contributed to empowering science in the US.

    Not the Drumpf family, tho. Those can stay there instead of returning to their roots in Germany. The last thing we want is a “Make Germany Great Again” movement - they’re already great right now, no need to fix what’s not broken, thank you.

    • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wish the first part were actually true, on the bureaucratic level. Sadly it is quite difficult to emigrate to the EU

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      How are they great?
      Their economy is going to shit, they have a massive right-wing party, are complete warmongers and supporters of genocide.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      wait isn’t there some christian story about exactly that … 🤔 something about some curse that is inherited and bans the people from living a good life or sth, i can’t remember. maybe that good life was symbolized as a garden, but i could be wrong

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The type of people who think like this, believe wholeheartedly that everything that doesn’t conform to their mindset is fascism/Nazism/[insert -ism you don’t like here]

    You might not like it, but that’s how it is

    Thinking like this will make you find fascism wherever you go. You’ll find it in Gaza, in Iran , Japan, Greenland. You will find it in your parents , your neighbor, your kids, street signs, China, in Bernie Sanders office, chatting with Obama, having dinner with Kamala, in opera, with monks, inside the ISS, even fucking Antarctica.

    Make yourself a favor and maybe think for a while before leaving your country to poison others:

    “if everywhere I go smells like fascism, is it them? Or maybe, just maybe, is it me”?

    Do it before you see a mirror and find fascism in there too

    Edit: if downvotes were actual votes, you guys might have won the election lmao 🤣

    • InversionOfControl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My family moved from the US to Australia during the end of his first term. We had considered it for a couple years prior but we had hope Trumpism would die by the end of his first term. Then Covid hit. Then the American right made political statements out of medical concerns like vaccines and masks. At that point, we had enough. I’m immunocompromised, and she was a non-citizen permanent resident. Neither of us felt safe in my home country anymore so we stated the immigration process for me for my wife’s country, Australia.

      As we wrapped up our life in Colorado, when we saw 74 million people vote to re-elect the traitor in Nov 2020, we knew we had made the right call to leave. A few months later he attempted to overthrow the government and install himself as unelected dictator. Our house sold a few weeks later and we left the US 2 months after that.

      The rule of law is dead in the US now, and I couldn’t be happier with our decision to leave. Just yesterday I read an article about ICE arresting and deporting a green card holding Australian upon his return from a funeral in Aus. That could have been my wife. Fuck that.

      Best decision ever.

      • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I want to leave to ensure the safety of those closest to me.

        But I also want to stay and fight like hell.

        Unfortunately, even if the immediate fascism were beaten back, I have very little faith in anything but capitochristofascism’s resolve to continue to be absolutely shitty, and general American ignoarrogance to reign supreme, for the rest of my life.

    • Fontasia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      “The belief that America stands for an idea beyond blood and soil makes its identity fragile, because an idea lives in people’s minds, where it is subject to lies, hatred, ignorance, despair, even extinction. But for this very reason, as long as enough Americans continue to believe in the idea with enough conviction to stick it out here and fight, the country that you and I once lived in will still exist for the generation after us.”

      The belief that a country should exist purely for nostalgic purposes is the kind of bullshit that got us here in the first place. Countries started existing so that a monach could control resources and worker productivity. Now they are used as a default identity for people to try and connect on some level. If you don’t treat the identity as fragile, sure it can never ‘die’, but it can’t improve or change either.