ColdSideOfYourPillow
- 12 Posts
- 14 Comments
The fascism was the
friendsenemies we made along the way.
You see, the joke is sex. That makes it funny.
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Femcel Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•I can't do it myselfEnglish11·8 days agoyaaiiii :3
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Femcel Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•I can't do it myselfEnglish22·8 days agoI read this, scrolled down, actually processed the words, and scrolled back up to stare at it.
I stared until the blurriness from the tears in my eyes made the catperson’s eyes appear closed. Did I win?
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Funny@sh.itjust.works•What must his life be like?English55·8 days agousername checks out
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Fediverse memes@feddit.uk•Please Spread Across More Instances FolksEnglish82·8 days agoIncorrect. It’s not about the fact that they’re communists. Rather, it’s about their strict nationalistic feelings towards Russia and China. They claim that these regimes are communist (which is incorrect), and thus support any action by these nations. They enable and overlook oppressive actions commited by them, while being quick to point out the oppressive actions of the other countries (which are openly capitalist).
I’ve seen many tankies debate with other people, and they frequently employ tactics used by conspiracy theorists, such as selectively accepting sources, and denouncing everything else as propoganda. I’ve even seen a tankie denounce a news outlet, then use the same outlet in the same thread to argue their point.
I say this as someone who finds Marxism appealing, by the way. So I am in no way (as far as I can tell) biased against these people.
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Fediverse memes@feddit.uk•Yay! More centralisation!English41·9 days agowait, what?
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Fediverse memes@feddit.uk•Please Spread Across More Instances FolksEnglish3015·9 days agoTo the tankies: please don’t spread across more instances. I prefer that y’all stay easy-to-block.
ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialto Eh Buddy Hoser@sh.itjust.works•“Art of the Deal”English9·11 days ago“Art of the Steal”
A chef is not skilled according to economics. However, “skill” as used in common literature and speech, still applies to these uncertified chefs.
From the country I’m from, you can open your own small restaurant without any qualifications.
Yes, I’m afraid to dine out when I return there during vacations.
it means it’s a job that almost anyone can do
Not exactly. Unskilled labor simply refers to jobs that do not require a formal certification. There are many economically unskilled jobs that require a high amount of expertise. One such example is often a chef (specifically, the ones which don’t have formal culinary education).
Chefs need to have a deep understanding of food preparation techniques, flavor profiles, food safety, menu planning, and the ability to work quickly and efficiently in a high-pressure environment. It is a demanding job that few people can do. Yet, according to economics, these people would be unskilled.
Personally, part of me believes that people shouldn’t nitpick the percieved inaccuracy of jargon based upon the usage of words in common parlance.
The other part of me wishes that the experts would have chosen a less polarizing term with more neutral connotations.
Most posts in this community are like that. The focus of this community is not on confusing design, but rather on the humor offered by the contrast in interpretation of the design. The intent doesn’t have to be ambiguous.