• piranhaconda@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “I swear I’m not dead!”

    “Yea we don’t care, you smell dead and it’s disgusting, leave until you take a bath”

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could you imagine the confusion if you are used to it though… you’ve considered this scent to mean dead your whole life. would be kind of like as a human noticing your heart isn’t beating, your skin is pale… realizing you are in a coffin and everyone’s performing a service… hmm… guess I am dead. course I guess that’s kind of the difference is humans aren’t so accepting of things. we could be unable to move, realize we are looking from the perspective of our head, which is on the ground 2’ away from the rest of our body and our first thought would be, "Hey can you hear me? Hello!!.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You have a spray bottle of oleic acid

    Who do you spray: Trump, JD Vance, RFK jr or Caroline Leavitt

  • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Ed Wilson”

    More commonly known as E. O. Wilson in his publications. Highly important scientist. Postulated that humans are eusocial creatures similar to ants, termites, seahorses, and naked mole rats because we follow a hierarchical pecking order.

    Read his book “The Social Conquest of Earth” if this intrigues you.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Postulated that humans are eusocial creatures similar to ants, termites, seahorses, and naked mole rats because we follow a hierarchical pecking order.

      Source? Eusociality does not involve any sort of ‘hierarchical pecking order’. The requirements are co-operative childcare, overlapping generations and division of labour.

    • Genius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      because we follow a hierarchical pecking order.

      Not the anarchists

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          In what world do people who have more power have it based on biology? You think trump is some biological specimen to get into power? Or is it the societal structure we created that allowed him to rise to power?

          The hierarchical structure of humans is some literal right winger shit.

        • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Not accusing you of anything, just find it funny how “look at it from a purely biological position” is exactly the line transphobes use

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Christ. I forgot that it’s impossible to speak about science online. I didn’t once insinuate that line of thinking.

            Fuck this thread. I’m deleting it.

              • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I know. But this just leads to a dog pile on Lemmy. It already started. It’s impossible to discuss human evolutionary biology without emotions getting involved for exactly the reason you stated.

                Because bad faith actors co-opted the language for their subverted messaging, it’s just a wash.

                • flora_explora@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Hm no, the problem is much more at the roots of science than you think. Most of biology is based on humans’ biased assumptions and expectations. For example, only when queer theory was developed did biologists really grasp how much deviant the animal kingdom in regards to sex, gender and sexuality actually is.

                  Just think how many layers deep this is: humans exist -> develop social structures -> develop social constructs that feel essential -> try to describe their own biology through the lense of all the prior layers -> develop awareness about some social constructs -> revisit their own biology but still with a lot of biases

                  What you express by saying that it isn’t possible anymore to just speak about biology is imo rather an expression of denying certain advancements we’ve made. Our ideas and models of biology a few decades ago may have been simpler, but not more true. We’ve just realized to some extend how complex biology is and how our prior models have made many poor assumptions.

                  EO Wilson is having his own concepts and biases of human societies and projects them onto this pseudoscientific narrative. He is obviously not aware of his own position in society and how it shapes his assumptions.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Like it or not, there are people with more power that dictate structure and an order of things.

          That didn’t work out too well for the French monarchy, did it?

          It’s more accurate to say that the average person doesn’t desire a power structure but merely tolerates it so long as it provides them with some benefit. The moment those structures become oppressive, they get violently torn down.

        • sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          This is absolute propaganda. Early human societies didn’t work like that. Hunter-gatherers didn’t work like that.

          This is yet another “brutal selfish liberalism is hUmAn nAtUrE!!1!1!!1!” shit that was disproven in 1800s.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    E.O. Wilson is a monster scientist. His book “The Ants” is mind-bogglingly thorough

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Well damn. I wasn’t expecting to be adding a new book to my reading list as a result of this thread, but y’all’s enthusiasm is such that I feel I have to.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        “The Ants” isn’t casual reading, it’s a dense compendium of everything known about ants, covering every known genus and their morphology and behavior. There’s a key, too, so you can identify ants based on their morphology, assuming you ever feel like counting antennomeres or tarsal segments.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      E.O. Wilson is my hero. More people should study his work for how to approach science. Passion and curiosity got him everywhere.