• Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why is it on a liberal private business owner to provide a public bathroom? This just seems like the myth people use to show why liberalism is either phony or unsustainable.

    It should be on the local government/community to provide public options.

    • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      In the context of this meme, centrist liberalism is claiming progressive credentials on the left pane, and showing its true face on the right pane. Liberalism is all about private property. So no matter what they say about caring about these issues, if you’re not paying you aren’t welcome. Liberal values are phony because money always trumps them. Look at how Dems treated paying customer Israel vs non-paying folks in Gaza.

      • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 minutes ago

        I don’t have time to argue bc I have to go to my publicly funded job soon that’s about to be gone because of Republicans, but as a civil libertarian I can tell you that’s a completely BS argument.

        If you’d like to read about privatized corporate government maybe check out this information on the Heritage Foundation and their role creating a “free market” in post Soviet Russia

        Here you go:

        Here is some info about the Heritage Foundation and the first go-between for US and Russia businesses

        Here is some information about how right-wing billionaire Peter Thiel has been involved in Trump’s privatization of unethical AI since at least 2017

        It seems like a lot of the stuff being blamed on Elon Musk was actually Theil’s idea, he was just smart enough to be quiet about it and let Elon be the face of taking a chainsaw to government bureaucracy (and consequently any publicly funded goods and services).

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Tell me you’ve never had to clean blood of the walls of a stall in a toilet at your minimum wage retail job without telling me you’ve never had to clean blood off the wall of a stall in the toilet at your minimum wage retail job.

    I get the joke, i agree with the message but I also agree with the bathroom being for customers only…

    It’s a mistake you only make once, they just need to use the bathroom and you feel like an asshole for turning them away so you let them use it and the next thing you know you’re cleaning fucking blood off the fucking wall.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Exactly, I feel like this is kind of a BS argument made by the right to say this is why liberal values are fake vs on the flip side they would be showing a wrecked bathroom in a private business to prove why liberals are suckers and liberalism is unsustainable. Like “This is what liberals want for America.”

      In reality most liberals just want you to fairly tax that business and property owners and use those tax dollars to reinvest in the community by building and maintain public restrooms and other public spaces… It’s really not rocket science.

      Nobody could reasonably argue it’s on you to provide public access to the bathroom in your home, why would it be different for a business? Guests/customers are one thing, but liberalism is not arguing it’s on you as an individual to take care of society.

      It’s on society to take care of people, and on you to contribute to and reinvest in society as in individual to be part of something greater than just yourself.

      • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Why should a private business be anymore responsible for providing a public restroom than you should be for offering a restroom to the public vs reserving it for yourself and guests in your home?

        If you pay taxes it should be on the government or local community to provide public availability to restrooms that are maintained with the tax dollars you and people in your community pay.

  • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I saw a yard sign once that said “all are welcome here”, right next to the “no trespassing” sign. Struck me as contradictory and made me curious what it meant to them.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      “all are welcome here”, right next to the “no trespassing” sign

      I read that as “I don’t care who you are or what you look like, just make sure you’re invited first”

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        All are welcome here was a campaign for welcoming refugees, I think. The no trespassing was for people wanting to fish from the river bank on their property that bordered public land, most of whom are first generation immigrants, Hispanic or Hmong. I interpreted it “people are welcome in our country, just not like, HERE.” I mean, I get it, but it had some of the same energy as this post.

        • nomy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Just FYI most places, if the water is navigable (usually around 3ft) there’s a right of way a few feet either side of the bank.

          Not a great idea to get into an argument with the land owner but legally it might give them some cover regarding fishing access.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Remind me of Orwell.

      “All animals are equal. Some, however are more equal than others.”

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I always did like how the Ferengi found human slavery abhorrent.

        But also didn’t really acknowledge that their women were effectively slaves.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You can pee for free and thousands of other places, including your house. I am allowed to put rules of who can pee and shit in my bathroom.

  • Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s pretty much rainbow capitalism, which is but a small part of liberalism.

    In reality, liberalism is much worse when it comes to things like human rights, singing it’s praises and championing democracy and freedom while committing/supporting atrocities, like Bill Clinton administration’s war crimes, Tony Blair’s invasion of Iraq, EU’s anti-immigration barbarism, Trudeau’s arms sales, current Israel Palestine genocide, etc.

    It’s baffling how many regular people call themselves liberal while not seeing the contradictions/utter hypocrisy. Even on ideological level, you can’t support things such as equality and free-market economics, they directly go against one another.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      like Bill Clinton administration’s war crimes

      Not defending liberalism, especially the Third Way perspective popularized by the Clinton’s. However, when you are talking about Clinton and war crimes are you talking about the war in Bosnia?

      Imo intervening in an ethnic cleansing is just about the only decent reason to go to war in the first place. There were plenty of war crimes going around in Bosnia, but the vast majority of them were happening to the Bosniaks, whom the Clinton administration was aiding.

  • guillem@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    And they will stop welcoming any of those if it benefits them financially.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Who is they? Do you even know who you’re talking about to make such an assumption?

      • guillem@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Normally “they” (and other pronouns) refer to the subject or the topic of the previous context. In this case, to the pictured venue displayed as a metaphor. I hope this clears things for you and cheers you up the little bit you need.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I’m aware of what they means grammatically, but thank you anyway.

          Please name the they in this case. If know this company and their previous history to know how they will react in the future, then I’d like to know who it is.

          Otherwise, you’re just throwing a blanket statement.

          There are plenty of businesses around me that would not bend the knee. I’m sorry you live in a place that doesn’t have that.

          • guillem@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Please refer to the second sentence of the comment you are answering to.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Neoliberalism is the belief in inequality based on class.

    Fascism is the belief in inequality based on identity.

    No wonder, it’s just a small hop.

    • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Food, housing and fair wages (especially to foreign workers) aren’t even rights to these people, i highly doubt they’re going to consider that

    • NewDark
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Liberals ultimately agree that capitalism is the way to structure society (but make it inclusive and give people rights, etc etc), while the secondary sign shows exactly where that inclusive line is drawn.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Liberals ultimately believe that the free market is all that’s needed.

        Neoliberals think the free market just need a slight nudge.

        Liberalism is closer to what the right wing turned the word Libertarian into today.

    • the_abecedarian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      the subtext of the meme is: liberals pay lip service to “supporting” marginalized groups, but refuse to help when their own interests are on the line (e.g. can people who aren’t customers use the bathroom in the store? no, because making money comes first)

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They welcome everyone but bathroom is for paying customers only.

      The real joke is that somebody out there thinks this is making a profound point.