How did they work exactly?

It’s called the imperial boomerang.

Also worth noting, they’re against Netanyahu mostly just because he hasn’t been prioritizing the hostages and rather going Hannibal directive instead.

I specified the publication but here’s a link (pay walled) https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-05-28/ty-article-magazine/.premium/yes-to-transfer-82-of-jewish-israelis-back-expelling-gazans/00000197-12a4-df22-a9d7-9ef6af930000

Nah, they want to stick their peener in angrily.

Half are in favor of killing all the Gazan Palestinians and something like 80-90% are down with fully ethnically cleansing Gaza (source haaretz). I could also drag out the poll from about a year ago where the vast majority of Israelis agreed that the force used in Gaza was “just right” or “not enough”.

If it makes you feel any better, it’s only because they’ve forcibly had regime changes and they aren’t democratic precisely because the people are generally not on board with this shit.

Breaking: More spoons found in kitchen than bedroom.

Firstly, Israeli society writ large is incredibly fascist and generally on board with this shit.

Second, they aren’t idiots, just demons, especially the US. Most western powers are basically vassals to the US empire and any individual country trying to break from our adenda will pay dearly.

Thankfully, we’re doing a wonderful job isolating ourselves lately, so it’s possible more worldwide resistance will flourish. It will cost a lot of people’s lives and livelihoods in the death throes of empire though.

Most of them are western puppets. The ones that aren’t tend to make the headlines (Iran/Yemen/Lebanon)

[Redacted]

It’s close enough for a soundbite or a headline.

In a sick way I’m glad it’s the language I was raised with. On the other hand, maybe the British should have conquered less.

I think the “it” there can also be the human nature to want to love/fuck many people, not just a single partner. I’m being charitable as I don’t think that’s the point they’re trying to make, but I’m not the commenter, so idk.

I mean, the rest of the comment did not help. It feels like a misogynistic critique of “how women are”. Glad you were able to pick up on that interpretation; but it obviously can be read, you know, the way it is literally written.

He was better on crack.

So you meant to say:

And most of the time it is women cheating in those movies.

Which, fair enough if that’s what you meant.

I fail to see how this forces the government to do anything really.

It might change the calculus enough in that direction to be impactful, but that’s about it. They’re servants to capital, not us.

It sounds like the point they’re making is more: “we internalize and understand relationship norms through serial monogamy, and maybe more people would benefit from reconsidering if that is what they want.”

Not: “You wanna cheat on your partner? Just do it lol.”

You might be internalizing those movie scripts and your own lived experience. A cursory Google search indicates the opposite.