Summary

Canada has avoided the severe egg shortages and soaring prices seen in the U.S. due to differences in farming practices and regulations.

While avian flu has devastated large American egg farms, Canada’s smaller farms and tightly sealed barns have limited the impact.

The U.S.’s industrialized egg industry, driven by cost efficiency, is vulnerable to supply shocks when outbreaks occur.

Canada’s supply management system ensures stable production and restricts imports, keeping farms smaller. Meanwhile, U.S. consumers face continued egg price surcharges and supply pressures.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    23 hours ago

    But perhaps the biggest difference is that egg farms in Canada are much smaller, so when one farm does suffer a flu outbreak, the effects are less far-reaching. The typical egg farm in Canada has about 25,000 laying hens, whereas many farms in the U.S. have well over a million. In effect, American farmers have put a lot more of their eggs in a relatively small number of baskets.

    About what you would expect.

    • Fishamatician@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The US has frequent salmonella outbreaks as well, most countries vaccinate the hens but the US poultry industry said that 14 cents per bird would harm profits…

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In other words - taking capitalism to the extreme to cut costs.

      “What if we just pay chicken farmers for their eggs and sell them?”

      “But it will be much more cost effective if we cram these million chickens into a warehouse and drive the small guys out of business!”

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      22 hours ago

      A million. Christ. Probably all caged living awful lives, poor things.

      I have 2 backyard chickens and they are really happy. Fresh eggs every day.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    21 hours ago

    i’m kind of surprised us hasnt just been disregarding the avian flu and used the diseased chickens as if there was nothing wrong, that would fit with everything else going on

        • bus_factor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          As someone in a household with a lot of egg allergies, a lot of the vegan substitutes these days are surprisingly good. A scramble or omelet using Just Egg is surprisingly similar to the real deal, and the egg substitute powder from Bob’s Red Mill is good for a lot of baking.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            for me it’s not just about the egg shortage; I don’t trust meat or dairy from here to be safe anymore. but.

            you need to spam the front page with this.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Despite the trade war, the U.S. government has one potential solution to help meet demand and keep egg prices from climbing even higher: temporarily increasing egg imports.

    I think the world should tacitly embargo the USA for eggs, since Trump doesn’t care to treat any trading partner well.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s worth noting that supply management is a type of central planning where we centrally determine how much we’ll produce and what the price of production will be.

    Individual, often small, farmers then produce those eggs and get paid this price. The price and quantities are set so that it’s sustainable for farmers to produce. Farmers have the certainty they’ll sell their product at a decent price. They aren’t at the mercy of the market putting them underwater after they’ve spent large amounts of capital to produce.

    Consumers pay a generally higher price for eggs than the absolute minimum possible, but we also avoid paying much higher prices during shocks and shortages. Our farming sector isn’t consolidated by necessity of achieving the lowest price.

    We do this with more than eggs.

    • Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That sounds like socialism which is bad because it’s bad. Look what happened in Canada, they didn’t pay animal and worker abusingly low prices and now they don’t have insanely high prices. Without causing these situations they are denying large parts of their population high sustained cortisol levels.

      This is why we need to maintain our threats of annexation. We must provide them the stress that their government denies them.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Broiler chickens, dairy, and other poultry industries have this.

      We should bring it back for crops (return of CWB)?

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think Harper sold it to the Saudis. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s some provisions that bind Canada to not create a new board. With that said we should absolutely create a new board. Use the crisis. I guess we’ll see how much of a Keynesian Carney is. Assuming we elect him of course.

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Harper did more damage to Canada than almost any other PM (selling CWB, signing the FIPPA with China, etc). The fact that he’s back here (secretly?) advising PP makes me sick to my stomach.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Another major factor is that Canada raises more of their chickens indoors due to how cold it gets, significantly decreasing their risk of exposure to avian flu.

    The US has way more free-range chickens, and free-range chickens are most at risk.

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve seen tons of videos of people who actually free range their chickens, actually outside, and they’ve had no avian flu problems with their chickens. 🤔

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      actually its overcrowding in farms too, they have indoor farms where its considered free range, but enough chickens to become crowded and you see dead chickens that are discovered til later.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes and no. Free range in America means “raised in a huge building and never seeing sunlight.” Basically what separates them from cage free is that thousands of birds all share one giant cage instead of four birds to a cage inside the larger cage.

      Pasture raised are the ones that get to go outside and eat bugs in the sunshine.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Free range vs pasture raised in America

        Canada is a bit different in its designations. ‘Free run’ means they’re in the barn and ‘free range’ means they have access outside the barn (weather permitting ofc).

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The chickens that are outside eating bugs in the sunshine are the most likely to catch avian flu due to exposure to wild birds 😕

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          they are more spread out, so less chance of getting h5n1, some brands use pasture, garden raised and they are less likely to be recalled for avian flu, of course these are more expensive too.

          when you are super-crowded indoors, viruses spread more easily.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Do you have a source that free range chickens are less likely to get avian flu? Because in the article it mentions chickens that don’t have contact with nature outside a facility are less likely to get it

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          But if they do catch it, they’re way less likely to spread it to a literal million other chickens, so there’s that

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        And they pick each other to death in those “free range” areas.

    • dnick@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not sure if it’s still this way, but a documentary years ago described the ridiculous technicality that allowed a farm to call themselves free range. It was like a door that led outside to a 4 foot cube area shared by thousands and thousands of chicken. Basically enough room for like three chickens to spread their wings… If they happened to find the door, and it wasn’t already crowded… And they were actually able to walk.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    driven by cost efficiency,

    It’s not so cost efficient now is it?
    Poor safety standards is a short term strategy.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have you seen egg producer profits lately? It’s great for them to have an opportunity to find out exactly how much consumers are willing to pay for their precious eggs. Super cost efficient, for them.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Profits <> cost efficiency.
        Obviously those that have eggs good enough to sell, like small producers, make more money. But those that had to put down all their chickens are more likely to go bankrupt.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not necessarily. The long-term / short-term focus is a red herring. Without intervention, the system drives people to focus on ever shorter term in order to compete. Because firms can fail due to competition in the short run, before any negative effects of the short term thinking of the competitor have materialized. It’s even possible to consolidate the market before “the chickens come home to roost.” And then you have the mitigating factors - once you consolidate a critical market, your problems are the society’s problem and the society will pay to resolve the issues from your short-term thinking. And then you have the ability to get out of the market before the big problems start showing up. Put all of this together and you can see that the completion for profit in a competitive market can easily drive shorter and shorter term planning without the winning players facing consequences. If it’s not profitable to focus on long term planning and the system uses profit to determine success from failure… I think we can’t expect individuals or even firms to focus on the long term.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        In theory that could all sound very true.
        But the investments need to pay themselves back, and setting up large agricultural production takes time to earn back the investment. So there are limits as to how short term you can invest.

        This is probably the lowest denominator disease, where investments become more and more irresponsible, because of lack of regulation that set a lower bar for how irresponsible you can be.

        Kind of the same as with the financial crisis almost 20 years ago, that caused an economic slump for 10 years. I wouldn’t be surprised if the egg market similarly will take a decade to return to normal.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right but if investment relies on regulation to be responsible, and removing such regulation leads to potentially higher profits… And if you’re able to collect profits on future expected returns today via asset markets… Then wouldn’t most try to get rid of such regulation? Most of those people 20 years ago made a killing following deregulation they lobbied for earlier.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            And if you’re able to collect profits on future expected returns today

            This is true, but it’s 99% a misunderstood perception by the buyers, they generally fail to realize that they are buying in at way higher risk.
            Deregulation does not generally promote profits, even when it allows to cut cost.

    • blakenong
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, Civil War 2 is eggs, WW3 is because the US tried to take over Greenland, Canada, and Panama… perhaps to get more eggs.

  • Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    The US in this is the spitting stereotypical image of a man building something, and going “What’s this? Don’t need manuals. (Throws manual away)”, and then wondering why nothing fits, why some parts don’t seem to have a place to go, and some other parts are missing.

    Why regulations? They serve no purpose. Why does no one import US hormone-riddled meat and heavily synthesized food products? I really wonder.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would be nice if that was the process. Instead it’s the extraction of ever increasing profit that drives this. The big factory farms didn’t occur out of not knowing how to farm. They were created as the well established way to decrease costs per unit produced, at least initially. Then large factory farms allow consolidation of production, since they can only be built and operated by large capital, and small farmers don’t have it. Then the few owners of these farms are free to set the prices of whatever they produce as high as the market will bear. The owners now also have the leverage to get less regulation, since regulations generally increase costs.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      In this specific example the regulators are doing their jobs, although a few HHS employees were fired in the early days of the Trump admin there have still been large-scale culls for infected livestock to prevent further spread.

      Instead, this is an example of how important antimonopoly laws are and how the USA just straight up ignores it. Canadian egg farms are less than a twentieth the average size, less birds get infected and culled as a result.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder if that’s also the reason pasture raised eggs are cheaper and more available than the other types of eggs where I live. I kid you not, the pasture raised eggs are $3-$4 less than the other types. Free range eggs are $2-$3 cheaper. There are also backyard eggs available for even cheaper.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      they usually are more expensive than free range, followed by garden and restorative which are the most expensive ones, plus the eggs that produce different color or textures, which uses different farming pratices.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      There are actually more free range chickens in the USA than in Canada due to the weather.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That is also the reason why the US has to wash the eggs and chlorinate the chicken.