• 2 Posts
  • 227 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 2nd, 2024

help-circle
  • But America has been doing this, funding wars etc, for decades. Vietnam, Iraq, South Korea. Taliban, Saddam, Bin Laden. List goes on.

    Is it because you’re personally affected now that your view has changed on the involvement of your country in another’s?

    And had the way you voted, or lack thereof, made any difference to the situation? From what I can see, it’s made things so much worse, not only for you and your fellow citizens, but globally. Not only is the genocide continuing to be funded (now with fervour and the promise of developing the stolen land), American citizens and foreign travellers are being unlawfully detained.

    I don’t know about you, but from the outside looking in, it was extremely obvious to me that KH was the better candidate because she could be reasoned with. Of course, you have many other better candidates but your system only allows you to choose from two.

    Honestly, the American voting and political system sucks; I empathise with you there. If you’re going to be angry at something, be angry at that and force a change to get in a candidate that represents you and your values. You got great politicians like AOC and Bernie but with the current system, they’ll never be up for the top job.






  • But a cloned human is an artificial intelligence.

    No, it’s not. Artificial intelligence is something that is artificially created, like a machine, that can think like a human. A human clone is human, literally.

    I think we’re both standing from extremely different points of view here on what AI, that is artificial intelligence actually is. But I concede that my statement about it being impossible to create is hyperbolic. We’re can’t say for certain that it’s impossible.

    I know that form of ai is not what you are referring to, but why not?

    … Because… It’s wrong.

    I wouldn’t call investing power and resources to replicate human capability progress. It’s literally going backwards and rebuilding from scratch. Is this line of research honestly worth pursuing at the cost of our climate and environment? It’s the same with the Wright Brothers; their technology paved way for increased consumption of resources and rate of spread of disease.

    Yeah we get brand new shiny things but at what cost? Is it worth it in the long run? Is it worth automating human capability when we’ve messed up every single step of our planetary ecosystem?

    I would much rather live in a world where all the effort and resources that is currently put into ‘AI’ redirected into sustainable systems. That, to me, is progress that is worth pursuing.


  • redwattlebirdtoFuck AI@lemmy.worldThe Perfect Response
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Art can be automated, nature does it all the time.

    Ok, first off: what is your definition of automation? This is what I mean when I say automation.

    Nature does not automate art. Are you equating the process of, say, almost all bower birds make bowers, therefore that’s automation? Then you have a poor understanding of what automation, art, and therefore AI/LLM, is meant to achieve.

    With art, you need to think about the state of mind to create that piece in the first place. Before it was created, it doesn’t exist in any capacity. Why the art piece exists in the first place is the reason why AI cannot automate it because human emotions are very complex.

    If an AI/LLM can experience human emotions, we’ve essentially created another type of human. This is deeply profound and, with the technology and materials we have now (that is, the processing chips and hardware), it is simply not possible. We’re at the point where we’re making small, tiny leaps in gains.

    Which leads me to…

    It’s a prototype, but its also a hardware issue. Soon there will be much more efficient designs and i suspect a rather significant alteration to the architecture of the network that may allow for massively improved efficiency.

    It is not a software/coding issue that limits an LLM’s capability to emulate the human psyche. Again, it is not tweaks in code structure that will send us rocketing up the graph of progress. It is the limitation of the actual materials that we use and their maximum efficacy, hence why we need nuclear reactors and so on to power thousands of processors. We will never get to the point of replicating human ability and energy efficiency with the materials that exist in Earth. And, are we going to spend more energy and resources to look to the stars for a material that may or may not exist to create a machine that has the capability to think as a human?

    How long did humans take to evolve to the capacity we have? That took hundreds and thousands of years of trial and error. But I digress…

    Its inherit to capitalism.

    Absolutely agree. The whole purpose of this ‘AI boom’ is to make more money for the <1%, steal from us and hoard it for themselves. On this basis, I completely reject the use of LLMs. Fuck AI.


  • redwattlebirdtoFuck AI@lemmy.worldThe Perfect Response
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The issue isn’t automation itself. The issue is the theft, the fact that art cannot be automated and the use of it to further enshittification.

    First, the models are based off theft of OUR data and then sold back to us for profit.

    Secondly, most AI art is utter crap and doesn’t contribute anything to human society. It’s shallow slop.

    Thirdly, having it literally everywhere while also being completely energy inefficient is absolutely dumb. Why are we building nuclear reactors and coal plants to replace what humans can do for cheap??

    Edit: further, the sole purpose of AI is to hoard wealth to a small number of people. Calculators, hammers etc. do not have this function and do not also require lots of energy to use.





  • redwattlebirdtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    It doesn’t matter. The choice was the status quo or something worse for everyone on earth, economically.

    Everyone in the world knows the US election system is crap and has been getting more crap for decades. The world isn’t angry at you specifically. The world is angry at the apathy of the general American public and the sheer amount of influence America has over the global economy since WW2.

    There were protests for George Floyd. There was the MeToo movement.

    But when it comes to a convicted felon and known criminal taking the top seat? Crickets. Anything that isn’t US centric, such as the global economy, doesn’t seem to rustle any of your jimmies. Hence, we’re pissed because your apathy has brought in economic instability on all of us when it could have all been easily prevented.

    Something as small as ‘not having the right candidate’ or even ‘sticking it to the libs’ means nothing to the rest of the world when what we have now it’s the alternative.

    For a country with so much global power, the populace is so, so, so small minded.









  • What you do not do is drag people into the streets banging pots. It’s not the 1960s

    Are you sure? I’m pretty confident that’s what happened on the weekend.

    Also, relying on technology owned and controlled by the billionaire class is a bit rich…

    Anyway, I don’t want to antagonise you. Just don’t discount the traditional methods of communication thinking it’s ineffective. In a world where privacy is almost non-existent and you’re constantly being monitored, going analogue is one of the best tactics there is.