Experiments generate quantum entanglement over optical fibres across three real cities, marking progress towards networks that could have revolutionary applications.

  • toiletobserver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    496 months ago

    Can’t wait until the Internet consortium tells Comcast they can’t use another misleading name

    • @DudeDudenson
      link
      English
      486 months ago

      It pisses me off that they’re calling quantum data transmission quantum entanglement, it’s not the same thing and it’s misleading as fuck.

      Quantum entanglement is about two quantum particles sharing the same state which if implemented somehow would allow for universal communication with no time lag. Sending quantum state communication through fiber optic, while an achievement for distributed quantum computing, is not quantum entanglement!!

      • @fed0sine@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        Man, reading the title I thought quantum entanglement had finally arrived and I clicked that shit so fast 😂

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        Quantum entanglement communications also have fundamental problems that will likely render them effectively unusable. You need a key to decrypt anything you send, and the key has to travel no faster than c. It’s impossible to tell the data from the noise without the key. Attempting to read the data or to change the data being sent also collapses the effect, which can only be fixed by bringing the two systems together. In short, you can only send a single packet of data and you can’t use it without a key transmitted using traditional methods.

        • Toes♀
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Can that be scaled? c is still better than rotting cables.

          • VindictiveJudge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            The limit is c because you have to use cables, radio, or other traditional methods to send the key. The data in the entangled pair would also have to be set at the time the two devices are constructed, so that’s not super useful. It might be useful for single use authentication, but that’s about it.

            Don’t think of entanglement as being like one object in two spots. Think of it like identical twins. One twin getting a hair cut does nothing to the other twin’s hair. Similarly, altering a property of one entangled particle does nothing to the other and actually means they are no longer entangled or identical.

            • Toes♀
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Oh that’s really helpful thanks for the clarification

              • VindictiveJudge
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                No problem. I was pretty disappointed when I learned all the sci-fi writers were getting it wrong. Though, to be fair, it really should be called something else.

                • Toes♀
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  36 months ago

                  Yeah that’s exactly what I was comparing it too.

        • @DudeDudenson
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          But artificial intelligence has always been a murky definition and we’ve been using it for similar stuff (emulating seemingly sentient behaviors) for decades

  • Kairos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    116 months ago

    A quantum internet could enable any two users to establish almost unbreakable cryptographic keys to protect sensitive information

    We can already do that dumbass.

    • @RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      I guess that’s far more unbreakable than what we have. But anyway, several three letter agencies will fight this (again) tooth and nails.

      • Kairos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        This will be useful for militaries and corporations, not consumers. If it can’t work anywhere (or over a VPN, or wirelessly, etc.) It won’t work.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      Ah, finally. Now we will stop talking about, hearing about, and shoving “AI” in everything and the next new thing will be “quantum internet enabled” things.

      • Kairos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        I’m sorry. I realized in a comment below that one its very useful for governments/militaries and corporations.

  • @QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96 months ago

    A very useful video that explains what Quantum Internet is… and what it isn’t:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-j8nGvYMA8

    TL/DW: A big misconception here has to do with Quantum entanglement. Quantum Entanglement in Quantum Internet doesn’t mean that you can transfer data at speeds faster than light.

    It’s true that this connection would be “ultra secure” but this would be very inefficient (slow) and it wouldn’t be reliable in a noisy environment. It would probably be most useful for some sort of authentication protocol/key sharing.

  • @____@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 months ago

    “Almost unbreakable keys” - I’m not up to speed on what this race entails, relative to the current state of affairs. Does “almost” mean “any gov agency w/ a budget and quantum computers” can break it, it is it an actual step forward from the status quo?

    A question worth asking, in context of article.

    There’s not a ton of stuff I demand to be secure, full stop, but SSH and comms w/ my wife are among them. I need to dive deeper, and understand the actual risks.