Damn right they’re a safety issue.
I was crossing one the other week. Boom. Gay. Just like that. Had to get a divorce and everything.
Sorry for your loss. I become gay but my partner became trans, so it still worked out.
Lol I’m sure this is about safety and not a guy trying to feed a bunch of haters red meat so they don’t look at the death rates in texas hospitals
What’s a real “safety issue” is this nazi fucking regime.
This is just embarrassing.
I wish my town had a gay cross walk, so then there would be more gay people. Rainbows make people gay and gay people throw great parties and have nice communities. I need that shit in my town.
Be the gay you need. Once you get the gay it will spread and make more people get gay. Gay the fuck out of the place. Gay that mother fucking town up!
If rainbow sidewalks were actually unsafe, the engineers would know it already (because that’s their fucking job) and wouldn’t need a goddamned politician to tell them.
That’s 100% proof by itself (as if we needed any more) that Abbott is a bigot and a liar.
Fascists are anti intellectual after all.
They technically are unsafe. They screw with Seeing Eye Dogs. That being said, it’s just as easy to hang Pride Flags at cross walks.
RNIB Scotland Director, James Adams, said: “Traditional black and white pedestrian crossings offer high contrast, which is essential for people with low vision to detect and cross roads safely. Designs and colours which are not consistent with traditional designs could cause confusion to people with sight loss, and to guide dogs which are trained to stop at crossings.
You’ll also have to train dogs to recognize both approaches because the starting color will be different.
They technically are unsafe. They screw with Seeing Eye Dogs.
I think this might be true. Do you know of any published studies on this?
I’ll see if I can find a study, but advocates for the blind have talked about it.
Oh the colorblind seeing eye dogs? 🤔
I don’t want to dispute this, because it’s just provably true, but I have never been able to figure out why my dog’s favorite color was red. It was definitely 100% his favorite color, even when there were balls that looked identical in every other way except were green, which should have appeared like pretty much the same color to him. And it wasn’t just a single favorite ball. He preferred red for several different toys that came in packs of multiple identical units except for color.
Whatever happened to that “libertarian” way of thinking? Used to be that they wouldn’t listen to no goddamn politician now every one of those gadsden flag touting fucks are on their knees awaiting their favorite politician to tell them to say “ah”.
Politics are more tribal than ideological. Most people just repeat the slogans of their political tribe without putting too much thought into it. So calling out hypocrisy does nothing, most of politics isn’t really about having a consistent ideology.
Actual libertarians support people like Bernie Sanders. (Yeah, he’s big on social programs, but he’s also bigger on civil liberties than most Democrats, let alone Republicans.)
The main stream libertarian voice and narrative was stolen in 2010 and alas we never really got them back, even in the time of tyranny. No one in power wanted us on the sidelines talking about the importance of balancing liberty and security through policy. Certainly not fiscal discipline, or accountable government. I’m appalled by the people I meet who call them selves libertarian. Most of who are just conservatives that started smoking weed after seeing Joe Rogan do it.
I’m appalled by the people I meet who call them selves libertarian. Most of who are just conservatives that started smoking weed after seeing Joe Rogan do it.
I thought that was the joke about Libertarians since…forever - “Republicans who smoke weed”.
One of the corner stones of the libertarian movement was opposing global banking, and the surveillance state that bush set up. And then black president and then poof, we’re now the party of Sarah Palin?
Also, unmarked crosswalks are perfectly safe because drivers know pretty much every intersection has an implied crosswalk whether marked or not. This comment has been brought to you by the letter S and viewers like you.
You must have missed the post the other day, where some idiot texting ran over a girl in a crosswalk, then got out of his car to yell at her
“Texans expect their taxpayer dollars to be used wisely,” which apparently means removing already existing crosswalks and making new ones, for no other reason than the manbaby is afraid of rainbows.
dont forget about the state freezing over each year, people dying, and the govt not doing shit to negate this problem for next year.
The Texas governor is a safety issue
It’s an issue for the safety of his fragile worldview and values.
We should remove all safety and handicap ramps that lean to the left. For safety
His sycophants would carry him on a large palanquins and only the poor would suffer. It’s a shame you can’t make him suffer the fate of his disabled peers. These people will probably never be punished under their own rules unfortunately
America’s war on color continues.
Waiting for them to ban rainbows from kindergartens.
So there’s this daycare down the street from me. It has had a rainbow colored access ramp for as long as I can remember.
It’s now painted black.
It could be completely unrelated, but I highly doubt it.
You should complain.
Or at least, the non-bigoted daycare parents should. A huge part of this problem is caused by a relatively few assholes going full Karen about their own fucking hangups and making them everyone else’s problem. The solution is that decent people need to get EVEN LOUDER AND MORE PISSED OFF than they are, so that decision makers understand whose opinion actually matters here.
I just had a very similar conversation last night with some family and friends. There was a time when I would ignore shitty people’s opinions… After all, neither of us will change each other’s minds. However, that’s exactly how we got here. Those seemingly fringe, hurtful opinions now decide things for everyone. I’m not quiet any more.
Just like the famous Rolling Stones song. “I see a kindergarten access ramp and I want it painted black…”
If it had grip sand integrated into the paint it would make sense that it needed repainted, and getting one color of deck paint is cheaper, and black paint absorbs more sunlight so they need to salt less.
Still sucks, but it’s the same reason we can’t have cool cars anymore.
I’d go even further: public money is perfectly justified in painting it exactly one color, the color chosen for visibility. Beautifying the street, Adding color, character, interest to the neighborhood was privately funded and that should continue to be encouraged
It did not have sand in the paint. It had the adhesive strips on top of the paint.
Well then fuck those fascists
deleted by creator
So far Austin has sworn to comply and SAN ANTONIO has refused! Cant believe we lost Austin first!!
Keep Austin Bland!
deleted by creator
Want to add a + I visited San Antonio a few years back and it’s in my top 5 favorite cities now. Absolute gem.
They both only care about leftist issues when it makes property owners more money.
So which is it, a safety issue, or a “political ideology” issue?
And since when has a group of people existing been a “political ideology”?
The problem is that there pushing their culture onto everyone else.
They know what they’re doing. They want to encourage more people to be gay.
Yeah, it’s not the rainbow crosswalk that’s making you feel attracted to people the same sex as you. That’s something within you that makes you feel that way. And that’s fine. If you want to repress those feelings that’s a choice you make for yourself.
But we can’t structure our society around some people’s need to repress their gay feelings.
If people could think for themselves, you’d have a point.
So you want politicians to do the thinking for you?
The problem is that there pushing their culture onto everyone else.
This is so fucking priceless, it should be in a museum.
Please inform me which part of their culture they are “pushing” on everyone else, that way I can ask you why it’s okay for the straights to do it, but nobody else gets to.
LGBTQ people exist. That’s something you can never, ever change. So maybe get over it and stop saying that them existing in public is somehow negatively impacting anyone who isn’t just a scared little bigot.
Why do you people always bring up existence? Yeah, these people exist whether sidewalks are rainbow-colored or not.
They want rainbow crosswalks and more because they want to encourage more people to be gay.
I’ve been super straight my whole hole life, butt after reading your cumment I’m starting to have a staying desire for some meat in my mouth and I’ve been vegetarian for years! Now you got me bouncing on my bois d to this and I couldn’t have done it without you.
I’m gonna need you to look me in the eyes so I can finish.
Lmao ban weather because rainbows make you gay
Again, yeah. Gay people are awesome.
Colored streets is all it takes huh? Then we’re truly at risk of a birth-pocalypse.
Wait are you implying Greg abbot thinks rainbows make people gay? Or you think rainbows make people gay? If we removed like a color or two would it not be gay? Like take out 3 colors at random and it becomes a national flag. But too many color = gay? Bending light is gay? I guess it ain’t straight cuz it’s bent.
Hell yeah I do. Straight people suck.
If giving people judgment free spaces to be themselves makes more people gay then so bit, I’m sorry freedom scares you.
The existence of anyone not straight, white, wealthy and christian has always been political in the USA
Good riddance, those rainbow crosswalks jumped me stole my wallet, and dressed me up as a woman 6 times last week.
Maybe you should have worn something less provocative. Rainbow crosswalks will be rainbow crosswalks, after all.
This is a good thing.
Why?
Seems like a waste of time. Rainbow not rainbow, whatever.
It never should have happened in the first place, and we shouldn’t normalize repurposing public infrastructure to pander to anyone’s agenda.
What is the agenda?
Public spaces often have art and interest that reflects the community.
No issue here it adds color to a downtown area like many other art forms.
They want to encourage more people to be gay.
encourage more people to be gay
Ah. So your entire argument is based on debunked right-wing talking points.
1/10 trolling… or, $deity forbid this is a legit thing you think… in which case, go look at like ANY actual science around this subject in the past couple of decades.
Really? Do you actually believe that? When you see art of a whale do you think they want you to be a whale?
Or maybe is it that gay people exist and some art they might say oh look we are represented because we live in this community might be ok?
And if you are a kid, you see a rainbow. And if you are an adult you also can just see a rainbow. That is up to you.
People are left handed. People are right handed. People vary in skin tone and eye color. Nothing changes that. Nothing makes people gay. Just had to say it because you sound pretty ignorant.
This isn’t about whales. Stay on topic.
What is it about then? Some colorful street art reflecting a healthy community, or your ignorance?
Studies show rainbow crosswalks are slower and safer.
