• Omega@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            it would allow for a more efficient and streamlined delivery service alongside better regulated sale of goods and proper quality checking and consumer protections that most people moan about the lack of, which would not be fixed just by monopoly busting

            • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              nationalizing it would keep it a monopoly, while cutting it up would cause the bits of the company to have to compete to keep each of their delivery services efficient and streamlined

              consumer protections can be implemented with regulations

              edit: if you wanna silently downvote me, say why

              • Omega@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh, I didn’t downvote you. Others did, government corporations by themselves don’t act like monopolies because they do not prioritise money but instead influence and power, you wouldn’t need predatory tactics to keep people using your state owned solutions and a government wouldn’t employ predatory tactics to beat down on competitors, if it truly was meant only for the government then it would have private investment into the field made illegal.