

much less than half
much less than half
FDR had it less extreme than taxing anything with more than 5 million into the ground
no space rockets would ever be launched that means no satellite wifi for people in remote areas think abt the implications of this
just don’t use cloudflare if you dont like it and its not a single point, like they have tons of servers all over the planet
nuclear isn’t that bad ngl France uses a ton of it
and the wastewater that nuclear power plants make, its barely radioactive at all
I’ve heard stuff like bittorent doesn’t work well when the data is often updated or changed
I might be totally wrong, I’ve only ever used it once when downloading Wikipedia
Elon Musk supports the AfD in Germany and he did a Nazi salute at the American flag during Trump’s inauguration. Additionally he’s a billionaire who supports authoritarianism and the far-right, putting him in the upper right-hand corner of the political spectrum
There’s better things you can spend your time hating than a fancy autocomplete holding a paintbrush
I always understood it as trump wanting the natural resources that Greenland has, along with it being positioned in a future ultra strategic location for arctic trade. like if the polar ice caps melt in the summer then countries close to the north pole will be able to send more ships easily, making any land around chokepoints in this trade more valuable - like Greenland
not saying I like any of this stuff, but this is what I’ve heard
I think the methods they use to make all this ‘ai’ art is really interesting, like diffusion models and stuff, but the fact that they are literally stealing from artists and creators without compensating them is pretty bad
thats why we have space companies and a moon covered in mineable minerals ngl if humanity can figure out some way of sending everyone to space, we totally should might be better for the climate if done right
If solar was used everywhere then it would also require a large investment in batteries to power stuff in the night There’s pros and cons for everything and probably the best solution is to have several green energy sources, solar, wind, nuclear ect.
If one party promises to solve an issue to their voters, they can actually benefit from not doing enough about it so they can campaign with it again. If one party promises to not stop mass shootings, and the other benefits from promising to do something about them and then not doing enough, nothing much will happen. I really think this issue is a symptom of the two party system
I think it is, but it can balance out the theft imposed by the ultra wealthy its all about the nuance of the wording ngl
the govt takes ur money - this is theft monopolies and duopolies take ur money for basic goods and services - this is theft