Nope, once measured the quantum state of the sexualities collapses until changed so if it switches that implies that measured with somebody else or in a different way (which I suppose is actually not that uncommon upon thinking about it). So in conclusion we need to work on this quantum sexuality theory (or one of the participants has some explaining to do).
Listen, I don’t make the rules, but, as soon as anyone involved is nb or ag, everyone involved is double gay. Add an exponent for every nb or ag person involved.
Not a mathematical proof, but straightness isn’t the same as heterosexuality, nor is gay synonymous with homosexuality. Two enbies might have the same gender, making their relationship homosexual, but two enbies can also have very different nonbinary genders, therefore being heterosexual. However, those heterosexual enbies would still not be straight, because they aren’t a cis man with a cis woman.
It all comes down to straightness being an entirely normative category, not a descriptive one. It’s just like the bs concept of “whiteness” which will similarly exclude Europeans or people with pale skin because they don’t “fit in” for arbitrary reasons.
People who insist that it’s straight to have sex with the homies are trying to claim that they’re “normal” and shouldn’t be discriminated against just for who they fuck. It’s understandable to not wanna be discriminated against, and even more understandable to think rigid constructions of sexuality are stupid. Unfortunately, the problem with some of these people is that they only want to save themselves from being treated poorly, not get rid of “othering” in general. The enlightened approach is to be rid of straightness and arbitrary normalcy.
TLDR: you’re only straight if it’s a cis woman with a cis man, otherwise you’re queer/gay/not normal
is it gay if you’re both nonbinary/agender? i’ll award $2 and some pocket lint to anyone who can provide a robust mathematical proof
I’m agender and by my reckoning the sexuality of anyone who kisses me is entirely at my whim
Ooohh can I do that too? What if we kiss who gets to pick? Do we both get pick eachother’s sexuality?
Schrödinger’s sexuality
That also goes for having sex too - “hey babe, just so you know, it’s gay sex tonight, cool?”
Nope, once measured the quantum state of the sexualities collapses until changed so if it switches that implies that measured with somebody else or in a different way (which I suppose is actually not that uncommon upon thinking about it). So in conclusion we need to work on this quantum sexuality theory (or one of the participants has some explaining to do).
Do you compromise by having bi sex if they preferred straight sex one night?
It’s gay. Proof left as an exercise to the reader.
There’s a joke here about the transitive property. I can feel it.
ah no sorry that’s not a joke you’re feeling, it’s just my pocket cucumber…
can someone check my work here
Listen, I don’t make the rules, but, as soon as anyone involved is nb or ag, everyone involved is double gay. Add an exponent for every nb or ag person involved.
Not a mathematical proof, but straightness isn’t the same as heterosexuality, nor is gay synonymous with homosexuality. Two enbies might have the same gender, making their relationship homosexual, but two enbies can also have very different nonbinary genders, therefore being heterosexual. However, those heterosexual enbies would still not be straight, because they aren’t a cis man with a cis woman.
It all comes down to straightness being an entirely normative category, not a descriptive one. It’s just like the bs concept of “whiteness” which will similarly exclude Europeans or people with pale skin because they don’t “fit in” for arbitrary reasons.
People who insist that it’s straight to have sex with the homies are trying to claim that they’re “normal” and shouldn’t be discriminated against just for who they fuck. It’s understandable to not wanna be discriminated against, and even more understandable to think rigid constructions of sexuality are stupid. Unfortunately, the problem with some of these people is that they only want to save themselves from being treated poorly, not get rid of “othering” in general. The enlightened approach is to be rid of straightness and arbitrary normalcy.
TLDR: you’re only straight if it’s a cis woman with a cis man, otherwise you’re queer/gay/not normal
My brain got kinda surprised at reading “not normal” because I’m surrounded by queers all the time
That’s the first I’ve heard that being cis is explicitly a requirement for being “straight” …
It is for the people who get icked out about people who don’t have the “correct” genitals
Lol i feel like you just made this upEdit: that tldr isn’t quite accurate to the rest of your comment. But yes, very ridiculous, very outdated. Interesting perspective.