The unintended second message is probably closer to the truth, anyways.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      See above , this instance is for “text that conveys opposite messages when read in a different manner.”

      It’s not necessary for it to be confusing, just conflictingly readable.

        • ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          you can read it wrong, but you can’t confuse its meaning

          Most posts in this community are like that. The focus of this community is not on confusing design, but rather on the humor offered by the contrast in interpretation of the design. The intent doesn’t have to be ambiguous.