The unintended second message is probably closer to the truth, anyways.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    See above , this instance is for “text that conveys opposite messages when read in a different manner.”

    It’s not necessary for it to be confusing, just conflictingly readable.

      • ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        you can read it wrong, but you can’t confuse its meaning

        Most posts in this community are like that. The focus of this community is not on confusing design, but rather on the humor offered by the contrast in interpretation of the design. The intent doesn’t have to be ambiguous.