Makuhari (Japan) (AFP) – As Japan’s biggest defence exhibition kicked off this week, visitors got a close-up look at a model of its futuristic “railgun” that its makers hope will be able to shoot down hypersonic missiles.

Instead of gunpowder, railgun technology uses electromagnetic energy to fire a projectile along a set of rails at ultra-high velocity.

The round will then in theory destroy the target, which could be an enemy ship, drone or incoming ballistic missile, solely with its vast kinetic energy.

Other countries, including the United States, China, France and Germany, are also developing the technology, but Japan’s navy in 2023 claimed a world first by test-firing a railgun on a ship.

“A railgun is a gun of the future that fires bullets with electrical energy, unlike conventional artillery,” an official from the Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Agency (ATLA) within Japan’s Ministry of Defence told AFP.

“It is expected that threats that can only be dealt with by railguns will emerge in the future,” said the official, who did not want to be named.

The three-day DSEI Japan Conference defence fair, which began on Wednesday, comes as Japan adopts a more assertive defence policy and looks to sell more military equipment to other countries.

In particular, Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Germany’s Thyssen Krupp Marine Systems (TKMS) are competing for a major contract to supply the Australian navy with new warships.

Winning the multi-billion-dollar Project Sea 3000 contract to supply Australia with Mogami-class frigates would be Japan’s largest postwar military export order, according to Japanese media.

  • blakenong
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It is expected that threats that can only be dealt with by railguns will emerge in the future

    Like what?

    • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      it might be cheaper to use an electric powered weapon (like a railgun or lazer) than a chemical one (like a bomb or rocket) in some cases, like intercepting missiles

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Doubtful, given that they are ridiculously expensive and can only manage a handfull of shots before the railgun rails burn out. The GAO says that military laser weapons still cost somewhere between $1 and $10 per shot, making them 2 to 20 times more expensive than regular bullets.

        • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          for the railgun the economics might not be favorable but

          laser weapons still cost somewhere between $1 and $10 per shot, making them 2 to 20 times more expensive than regular bullets.

          Bullets that can achieve the same amount of damage as the equivalent laser shot?

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            And then some, of course. The advantage of energy weapons is the speed of light, but they have negligible kinetic energy and zero penetration, relying on surface heating to cause damage. It typically takes them several seconds on target to knock out a drone, and even longer on missiles designed for hypersonic flight.

      • blakenong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m sure the projectile options are greater with electric power. It doesn’t have to withstand a tiny explosion or gas pressure.

      • blakenong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Of course Japan would defend against Kaiju.