As tensions with China rise, scientists at America’s leading universities complain of stalled research after crackdown at airports

Stopped at the border, interrogated on national security grounds, laptops and mobile phones checked, held for several hours, plans for future research shattered. ⠀

Earlier this month the Chinese embassy in Washington said more than 70 students “with legal and valid materials” had been deported from the US since July 2021, with more than 10 cases since November 2023. The embassy said it had complained to the US authorities about each case. ⠀

“The impact is huge,” says Qin Yan, a professor of pathology at Yale School of Medicine in Connecticut, who says that he is aware of more than a dozen Chinese students from Yale and other universities who have been rejected by the US in recent months, despite holding valid visas. Experiments have stalled, and there is a “chilling effect” for the next generation of Chinese scientists. ⠀

The refusals appear to be linked to a 2020 US rule that barred Chinese postgraduate students with links to China’s “military-civil fusion strategy”, which aims to leverage civilian infrastructure to support military development. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute thinktank estimates that 95 civilian universities in China have links to the defence sector.

Nearly 2,000 visas applications were rejected on that basis in 2021. But now people who pass the security checks necessary to be granted a visa by the State Department are being turned away at the border by CBP, a different branch of government.

“It is very hard for a CBP officer to really evaluate the risk of espionage,” said Dan Berger, an immigration lawyer in Massachusetts, who represents a graduate student at Yale who, midway through her PhD, was sent back from Washington’s Dulles airport in December, and banned from re-entering the US for five years. ⠀

Academics say that scrutiny has widened to different fields – particularly medical sciences – with the reasons for the refusals not made clear.

Archive link

  • Liz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    245 months ago

    Yeah I mean, pay your graduate students about twice as much and make them only work 40 hours a week. Then you won’t have to import labor from outside the county.

      • @Arelin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Lmao liberals getting mad at (in this case non-existent) “violations” of laws that only exist to protect the capitalist class is always funny

        Intellectual property shouldn’t exist in the first place; it kills millions of people every year from patented drugs, etc. and it did so in Africa during covid.

        • @Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          While I agree that intellectual property has been abused over and over, especially in the last two decades, we need to remember the reason why patents became a thing, and that reason was to promote open research and cooperation.

          Without patents the only tool businesses had to protect and exploit their inventions and discoveries was secrecy, which creates a terrible environment for research, full of espionage and subterfuge and without a library of human inventions and research ready for anyone to take and build upon.

          It’s somewhat of a necessary evil, a carrot in order to incentivize businesses and individuals to share their research and their inventions, instead of keeping them to themselves in fear of someone else stealing them. It does have issues though, especially regarding the lack of a “fair” use of the monopoly the patent grants for it’s duration.

          And, again, I’m talking about patents. Copyright is a whole other can of worms, way worse in some ways.

        • @UsernameHere
          link
          35 months ago

          Then you spend the money on research and development with no reward. Let’s see how much new technology gets invented without IP laws.

          • @Arelin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            05 months ago

            Capitalist apologia; IP laws only hinder innovation by protecting megacorporations and their monopolies. Most real innovations even in capitalist countries happen from state investment anyway.

            how new technology gets invented without IP laws

            The video linked in the previous comment outlines some methods by which workers are compensated for their work instead of capitalists, some of which have been successfully utilized by socialist states like the USSR, and even in capitalist countries in the form of grants, etc.

            • Grants as mentioned before, the resulting creations entering the public domain to prevent monopoly over it
            • Decentralized platform for crowdfunding useful projects
            • “Patents” that only exist to make sure the correct people are credited for a work while keeping it public domain

            Proffessor Richard Wolff also has a video on socialist approaches to development.

            • BaldProphet
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              Except while the USSR was crumbling, the capitalistic United States wasn’t. Not really a convincing example of a “successful” system.

              • @UsernameHere
                link
                25 months ago

                Not to mention his “state sponsored research and development” isn’t publically available. Countries aren’t going to spend money on R&D just to give it to other countries. They keep their research private because it’s a matter of national security.

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          -185 months ago

          Those drugs wouldn’t be developed in the first place, if there were no IP. The system is not ideal, but I would rather address its issues than destroy everything completely. When hous is on fire, the right thing is put out the fire, not to destroy the town.

            • MxM111
              link
              fedilink
              -95 months ago

              It is not impossible, but are you seriously want to compare pharmaceutical advancements of Cuba and US? You can even compare USSR and USA at the time. USSR medicine was significantly behind.

              • Match!!
                link
                fedilink
                English
                145 months ago

                Cuba has 3% of the population of the US. I think it is fair to say they have disproportionately more medical advancement than expected for their population and wealth level.

                • MxM111
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  I am not sure “advancement per person” is right metric - the more advances the much harder to make those. This is why I was suggesting to compare it to USSR - fair comparison.

                • MxM111
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  Source? I would like to see how cuban pharmaceuticals are more advanced than that in US. Until you show concrete proof, I will say this is made up statement.

          • The Uncanny Observer
            link
            fedilink
            225 months ago

            Your comment is pretty ridiculous when you consider that multiple times in history, the scientists who invented vaccines or treatments that saved millions of people put those inventions into the public domain.

            The idea that without capitalism, there is no innovation, is ridiculous. Capitalism is a fairly new idea in history, you’ve just fallen for the propaganda.

          • @Arelin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            125 months ago

            When hous is on fire, the right thing is put out the fire

            The fire is the capitalist laws like IP; the “hous” is a country’s development. So yes, the fire should be put out.

          • @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            and because they’re on an instance without downvotes they’re only going to see the 7 upvotes they did get. It’s 2024 why are people still buying into capitalist realism?? All the guys pushing for it have all moved on to pushing pedo-nazi shit you should be better than this.

            • wildncrazyguy
              link
              fedilink
              -25 months ago

              If you think all capitalists are nazis then your ideology has blinded you.

              • @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                People pushing for capitalist realism absolutely are, and usually the nazism comes secondary to the pedophilia with those types.

                Also, relevant meme:

                • wildncrazyguy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  05 months ago

                  Never said communism is bad, friend, just that it’s not a good idea to be consumed by any ideological framework - that’s how you become a zealot or worse, an enabler to someone who corrupts the cause.

          • @hglman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            55 months ago

            People hate saving others, you really have to give them so many incentives to care. /S

      • @Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        125 months ago

        Yeah, it’s terrible how capitalists and their megacorps might not profit as much if that’s happening…

        (which it isn’t these days btw; countries like the US and China violated bullshit british IP laws when industrializing, and they don’t really need to do that once they are industrialized)

        • @ed_cock@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You are making it sound like China and its large corporations weren’t also very interested in profits and market domination.

          • @Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That’s included in the “industrializing” part, no?

            Under capitalism, industrialization and therefore “market domination” realistically means ignoring the laws meant to keep competition down.

    • @nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      Stealing IP by… Publishing their own work on publicly accessible journals and conferences? The absolute horror. You don’t steal public IP, you gain (or lose) the rights to use it.

      • @UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -35 months ago

        I would have no problem if everything was open sourced. However, Chinese capitalists steal this data, make it proprietary and profit off of it themselves. This is the “horror”.

        • @nekandro@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          125 months ago

          It’s public research. How exactly do you propose to make public research proprietary? The university holds the rights.

  • @forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    155 months ago

    Same shit different era. Always gotta be persecuting somebody.

    Also when Silicon Valley copies and steals they get praised as revolutionary innovators.

    • @knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      The Silicon Valley thieves are just copying and stealing from over a century of US industrial strategy.

  • @GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    125 months ago

    I foremost hope that the United States can regain a shred of its diginity and stop treating every foreigner like a criminal, stop funding a genocide, stop killing its own population with guns, have a decent social services program, etc. This is obviously a fantasy, so I secondarily hope these researchers can go back to China and do good work, where they won’t be treated as second-tier human beings.

  • @doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    75 months ago

    Not surprising when you look at all the anti-China stuff coming out of mainstream liberal orgs and communities.

  • @treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    Earlier this month the Chinese embassy in Washington said more than 70 students “with legal and valid materials” had been deported from the US since July 2021, with more than 10 cases since November 2023.

    So like 20 out of about 20k/year. Big story.

    • @alpaga1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I like how the summary conveniently avoid mentioning the fact that in the year 2023 30000 visa were given to chinese students. Its quite sad how most people dont bother reading the article. As per the article: “The number of people affected is a tiny fraction of the total number of Chinese students in the US. The State Department issued nearly 300,000 visas to Chinese students in the year to September 2023. But the personal accounts speak to a broader concern that people-to-people exchanges between the world’s two biggest economies and scientific leaders are straining.”

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    35 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Stopped at the border, interrogated on national security grounds, laptops and mobile phones checked, held for several hours, plans for future research shattered.

    The exact number of incidents is difficult to verify, as the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency does not provide detailed statistics about refusals at airports.

    But the personal accounts speak to a broader concern that people-to-people exchanges between the world’s two biggest economies and scientific leaders are straining.

    But now people who pass the security checks necessary to be granted a visa by the State Department are being turned away at the border by CBP, a different branch of government.

    “It is very hard for a CBP officer to really evaluate the risk of espionage,” said Dan Berger, an immigration lawyer in Massachusetts, who represents a graduate student at Yale who, midway through her PhD, was sent back from Washington’s Dulles airport in December, and banned from re-entering the US for five years.

    But following years of scrutiny from the Department of Justice investigation into funding links to China, and a rise in anti-Asian sentiment during the pandemic, ethnically Chinese scientists say the atmosphere is becoming increasingly hostile.


    The original article contains 865 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!