Rikudou_SageA to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoGoogle search is losing the fight with SEO spam, study saysarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square130linkfedilinkarrow-up1622arrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@slrpnk.nettechnology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1608arrow-down1external-linkGoogle search is losing the fight with SEO spam, study saysarstechnica.comRikudou_SageA to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square130linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@slrpnk.nettechnology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareNanoooK@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoFirst time I’ve heard of them. I like the concept but 5$ a month for only 300 search makes me think that you’d still need another search engine on the side, or pay for the more expensive plan.
minus-squarelepinkainen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThe 300 searches goes pretty far because you usually get the correct result the first time. Also you can just use hashbangs to search directly from a site like imdb, letterboxd, goodreads etc so those don’t count against the 300 either.
First time I’ve heard of them. I like the concept but 5$ a month for only 300 search makes me think that you’d still need another search engine on the side, or pay for the more expensive plan.
The 300 searches goes pretty far because you usually get the correct result the first time.
Also you can just use hashbangs to search directly from a site like imdb, letterboxd, goodreads etc so those don’t count against the 300 either.