• @BabyVi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22910 months ago

    Not gonna lie, if a Furry told me they got arrested by animal control I’d be impressed.

      • @dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1610 months ago

        Considering fur is a kink for a bunch of people, I’d say this is entirely likely. Even more so: your animal control Dom is also a furry.

      • @HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        This is a thing at burning man every year. A group goes out as animal control with nets and catches furries. It’s an ongoing feud

      • @AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Considering how terminally online one has to be to find themselves on this platform, I’m surprised how little any of y’all know about furries

        And well, it’s not literally animals in that sense. At least not the entire community.

      • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        That happened to me once! I was 15 and going to school, was riding a Lotus Eclair I’d fixed up. I entered the school zone and wanted to see if I could get over 25 mph. But there was a cop hiding and I got a ticket. I had to tell my parents, and I think they were impressed with my 31 in a 25 speeding ticket.

        The best part was having to go to court, and the judge asking how I got a Lotus (she was thinking of a car) and then upon learning the truth, asking the officer why he was wasting his time stopping a kid on a bicycle.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20010 months ago

    I’ve got to admit that Republicans are always finding new and creative ways to be outrageously villainous and hateful

    • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13910 months ago

      It’s because furries are overwhelmingly queer and often used as a stand in for fear mongering about trans people (ex: the “litter boxes in schools” rumor).

        • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7110 months ago

          I would say it’s more that they recognize furries are largely a queer subculture (regardless of the fact that straight furries exist) and correctly recognize it as less objectionable to most people’s sensibilities to say you’re getting furries removed from schools by animal control than it is to say you’re getting queer kids removed from schools by animal control.

          • @Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4210 months ago

            It sounds really outlandish until you remember that in the 80s, DnD was used to make everyone afraid of a literal Satan, and we ended up with children testifying they were flown across the country and back to participate in Satanic rituals or flushed down toilets into hidden chambers where people were sacrificing live animals to the Dark Lord in the 8-9 hours they were at daycare.

            People went to prison over this.

            • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2410 months ago

              In the early 90s my mom was convinced Satanic women got pregnant and gave birth to babies to murder in rituals, and nobody could prove it because they gave birth outside a hospital and no record of the children existed.

              I get some of the 80s/90s nostalgia but SO much of it was just actual hell lol.

        • @Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1010 months ago

          I mean, furries have been targeted by the right for a long time, but they are nothing if not famous for winning the battle but losing the war when it comes to trying to stamp out subcultures they don’t like. They’ve finally given up on trying to legislate homosexuality away, so now they’re turning their attention to a less understood and more marginalized subculture of individuals. They’ll give up on that eventually too when they realize they’ll never win and turn their attention to the next vulnerable group to rally and galvanize their base.

    • @Eylrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 months ago

      Being a politician is all about getting attention. The more outrageous the bill or the thing the bill is addressing the more attention. This bill will hopefully never pass, but here we are talking about it.

    • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      And projection that a bunch of them are probably into furries, or domination, or both.

      We clearly need Barney Frank’s ‘expose em when they oppress’ tactics back in the house.

  • @Sylver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18010 months ago

    On one hand, this has got to be public trolling. On the other, it’s still a bill calling for a classification of people to be removed from society. If it weren’t so scary it would be funny.

    • auk
      link
      fedilink
      7810 months ago

      Fascism demands outlandish “enemies” in order to justify punishment as policy. Usually, no suitable ones exist, so they are created through outlandish fantasy.

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      5210 months ago

      it’s both fucking insane and scary. remember that furry hate has always been thinly veiled homophobia

        • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2410 months ago

          This is a weird amount of preoccupation to have with a subculture of mostly queer people who just watched too much Disney and read too much Warrior Cats or Animorphs as kids.

          In general furries embrace their cringe and are unashamed of the stuff they enjoy, can’t say I see anything near as wholesome from the company you keep when you’re hand wringing about sexual degenerates that should be banned from schools.

        • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1610 months ago

          You can not be homophobic and have similar thoughts on a subject with a group that is.

          Very little has a strictly black and white separation in this world, it’s all shades of grey.

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            -1810 months ago

            Go tell that to uranium

            furry hate has always been thinly veiled homophobia

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            -1810 months ago

            I don’t want to fuck Bugs Bunny or be him.

            I like pizza, I’m not a Pizza-ie.

            • @EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2210 months ago

              And neither do most furries. It’s like saying gamers are fucked up because they wanna fuck Lara Croff and cosplay Let Me Solo Her. The weirdest parts of a community aren’t the only parts, or even the biggest parts. Plenty of furries just like watching Looney Tunes and Zootopia and making OCs.

              The furries=sexual deviants line was what they once said about Trekkies, and it was as true then as it is now.

                • @EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  810 months ago

                  Put way better than I could say it, thank you. As somebody who’s been on the edge of that community for years as an artist, the hatred they get has always baffled me.

                • @Furbag@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  610 months ago

                  But saying there isn’t a sexual aspect about it, is not true.

                  Bruh, take anything and you can probably find a sexual aspect about it.

                  There’s a sexual aspect about Sports Illustrated. I’m not going to turn around and say everyone who subscribes to Sports Illustrated is a pervert.

                • @VolcanoWonderpants@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  610 months ago

                  The sample they used is likely not representative of the whole fandom; they only interviewed 334 furries in the study, from a fandom made of millions of people. And the participants were all male, too.

                  …I can’t be the only one who actually reads these things, right?

                • @EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  410 months ago

                  I didn’t say there was no sexual aspect to it, but I stand corrected that there’s some sexual aspect involved for the vast majority (at least of the men they interviewed). I wish the rest of that study wasn’t locked behind a paywall, 'cause I’m curious about the details now. I wanna know what they mean by “some aspect.” However, it’s disingenuous/misleading to say that furries are attracted to animals, as that’s zoophilia and is on the same level as pedophilia. Grouping the two together like that is like “MAPs” claiming they’re part of the LGBT. My general experience with furries is that the animal fuckers are treated on the same level as the Nazi furs.

                  Whenever this kind of thing comes up, though, I can’t help but think about the internet outrage from when they made Lola Bunny’s boobs smaller in the new Space Jam movie and wonder how many of those people are the same people who call furries gross, lmao.

                • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  310 months ago

                  Hey, is there some reason you changed the phrase that the researchers very consistently used, which was anthropomorphic animals, which they defined in the very first sentence as being like Bugs Bunny? You get how that is not the same as looking at a living rabbit and feeling sexual arousal, right?

                  I guess “most furries want to fuck characters like Bugs Bunny!!” was just obvious shit everyone already knew.

        • @zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          Idk man that doesn’t quite sound like hate to me. More of a sting dislike. I think the point still stands.

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            -110 months ago

            Saying something is fucked up has been said about a lot of things. I’m sure there’s someone who’s said it’s fucked up to put pineapple on a pizza.

            Also you do realise those are things people are born as? Whereas no furry was born a non-human.

            The fact you would even compare them is a a revile as 4Chan trolls trying to link “maps” to LGBT.

        • @Laurentide@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Non-furries love anthropomorphic animal characters. Our culture is full of them; all cultures are. Furries didn’t invent sports mascots, Looney Tunes, the Easter Bunny, Aesop’s fables, or the Egyptian pantheon. Obviously it’s not the appreciation for talking animals that people actually hate. So why is it that, out of all the weird subcultures that exist, the one that gets the most hate thrown at it is the one centered around a love of something universal to all human cultures?

          It’s because the founders of the modern furry fandom were gay and poly, and the fandom has always had an overwhelmingly LGBT membership because it used to be the only non-fetish community that openly accepted gay and trans people. All anti-furry hate is either a negative reaction to the fandom’s queerness or a deliberate attempt to attack the LGBT community by proxy.

          • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            I’m sorry but the only way I can describe that perspective is “delusional”. First of all, I’m going to point out that by starting your conclusion with “All furry hate”, you’ve already revealed that you’re simply here to make generalizations instead of to be accurate. Nearly no statement that starts with “all”, “none”, “every”, etc. about such a large group (furry haters) is even worth considering.

            Now that I’ve gotten that out of the way: No, people don’t hate furries because they’re LGBT. Most people know nothing about the movement or its founders, and don’t care to. People dislike the furry community because:

            1. Fursuits look weird. Mascots and the easter bunny fall into this category too. Non-fursuit anthropomorphic animals (eg. Looney Tunes) are generally well-regarded, even somewhat if they’re from the furry community.

            2. Someone told them about yiff or showed them a vore picture and now they hate all furries.

            3. Their primary interactions with furries lead them into direct contact with “the weird kids” aka assorted cringy 12 year olds. Any community with a significant number of preteens will have this same repulsive effect on older teenagers and young adults, or even other preteens. See also: Fortnite, Skibidi Toilet, FNAF to some extent, Roblox, etc.

            That’s it. There’s no grand anti-lgbt conspiracy. Furries are just weird. If you want, I have access to a discord server that’s like 60-70% queer and I can make a google form to prove this.

  • Newtra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17510 months ago

    anthropomorphic behavior

    Anyone else morbidly curious about what happens if they don’t fix the bill’s wording and accidentally ban “human-shaped behavior” at school?

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    12210 months ago

    This is going to really suck for the school mascot.

    • @Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5910 months ago

      They have plenty, but they’d rather distract from society’s issues as much as possible so their arctic temperature IQ constituents don’t realize how bad they have it

    • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      If they can keep everyone distracted by The Gays™ or whatever other sexual deviancy the redhats can dream up, then maybe people won’t notice the roads falling apart or the useless police, or more importantly, which people are stealing all the money.

    • body_by_make
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not saying this justifies it (kinda the opposite), but there’s a massive furry community in Oklahoma. They even used to have very large conventions there (still might?)

      • @BulbasaurBabu
        link
        English
        1710 months ago

        Oklahoma where the furries come yiffing down the planes

      • @EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        At the same time, this douchebag wants to specifically target kids who are playing pretend to make their miserable lives bearable, just to distract from real issues like trans bills, don’t say gay, and governmental corruption.

  • @Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9610 months ago

    Humphrey’s bill, House Bill 3084, would ban “students who purport to be an imaginary animal or animal species, or who engage in anthropomorphic behavior commonly referred to as furries at school” from participating in class and school activities.

    This is, hands down, the worst description of furries I have ever read in my entire life.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I used to pretend to be a monster at that age. Would they have to call Monster Control?

        (I was a nice monster, like on Sesame Street.)

    • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2710 months ago

      So what I’m hearing is if I tell the teacher I’m a platypus I don’t have to go to class?

      Guaranteed if this law got passed there would be a high school somewhere where the entire student body shows up wearing cat ears.

    • @Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      Ironically also means that it basically wouldn’t apply to anyone unless that person specifically wants it to. Performative outrage bill.

    • @Globeparasite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      yeah you see you can’t do the intelligent thing of just saying “you have to come to school with normal clothes on” which is literally what countries with a brain did. Also this is generally left to the school to set up. In France the law just says that a school is allowed to implement rules regarding clothing. Just simply think of P.E clothing. The law has a couple safeguard like you can’t ban a specific outfit for being from another culture (obvious) and the rest is left for the school to decide

      • @Hobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        Like basically every school in the US has a dress code already. Don’t get this twisted into something else, this is purely performative nonsense by some backwoods inbred redneck.

    • @Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      I mean the impression I had for like a decade was essentially this. Then a guy sent me links on how to be his specific type of fantasy creature. It was sergel or sergal iirc. It had some really weird backstory and lore to the species detailing how they were warlords or something and I was really weirded out. It was very much like how some kids I went to school with would loose it if you told them that they weren’t whatever comic or movie character they were hyperfixated on, only more socially awkward and adults doing it.

      Anyway I feel like that’s as close as you can get without reading out someones entire backstory novel.

      • @Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1310 months ago

        …yeah that sounds about right for sergals, tbh

        Generally speaking, once you get past the “traditional” species like foxes, rabbits, cats, etc., and start getting more into the esoteric fantasy/scifi species like sergals, protogens, and yinglets, the people who create characters for those species tend to fall into one of two camps:

        • super srs “you must follow this lore to the letter or I will end you, by which I mean I will post a FurAffinity journal for my 7 followers complaining about your character diverging from the lore that nobody will pay attention to” types

        • “oh this looks cool I’m gonna make one and put my own twist on the design” types

        Funny story, the person who originally designed protogens tried to be the first type, but pretty much everyone ignored him and just did their own thing anyway

      • @AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Sergal

        It’s originally from a Japanese series or something I’m not really well versed into that specific lore

      • @paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        The above description would fit many many circumstances that are not furry related or problematic at all. Saying “I’m a cat. no, really” or meowing or licking your hand would all fit that description, (except not really because the word anthropomorphic is used wrong), but don’t mean a person is a furry. Moreover these behaviors by themselves don’t cause any problems unless you imagine a bunch of other stuff that’s not included in this definition.

        So it is an overbroad law that allows prosecutors to apply it selectively and at the same time is very hard to defend against.

        A better definition for the purpose of the law would describe some behavior that actually causes damage to society, like disrupting class or arresting kids at school for saying they are a cat.

        A better definition of a furry would probably include some kind of pattern of behavior and the extent to which it impacts daily life, as here

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        910 months ago

        I wouldn’t use a definition that includes some kid prancing around race track pretending to be a horse. That’s just kids being kids and politicians need to stop sexualizing them.

        • AgentOrangesicle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Not even sexualizing, right?

          I love furry culture because I can see the art that’s intended for Magic The Gathering cards before it goes into print.

          The internet has to get over this furry shame and start collectively recognizing that a tail is like a necktie for your butt, and everyone should have one, because it’s rather flattering.

  • @CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8110 months ago

    Imagine being an animal control guy and having a school seriously call you and ask you to take a stranger’s child because of that child’s participation in a subculture.

    • @Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      Pretty sure that will leave the animal control people open to being charged with botched citizen arrests. Not sure what Oklahoma’s particular arrest laws are like but for most States you are pretty limited in what you can do to perform one and the standards of places you can use to detain an arrested person in are usually at least required to be humane and actively monitored.

      The answer to "Little Timmy wore a tiger costume to school for Halloween do you have a cage available? " should properly be “Get fucked authoritarian scum I have actual work to do.”

    • @scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1810 months ago

      Imagine working for the state and being ordered to engage in a random citizen’s kink.

      Yes, I know being a furry isn’t just a kink.

      • @stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        being ordered to engage in a random citizen’s

        That’s called oppression. Also furry is an identity, believe it or not.

        • Rayspekt
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          I’m not buying the “furry isn’t just a kink” thing at all, but please enlighten me. How does it qualify as an identity?

          • @Breve@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Belonging to a fandom or other special interest community is typically something that is done through self-identification, which is different than identities that are not chosen, but still part of a broader idea of identity. There are plenty of examples of these self-chosen identities: Trekkies, Potterheads, Bronies, Cumberbitches, etc. Simply watching Star Trek doesn’t make you a Trekkie though, it’s a label people apply to themselves when they feel invested in that thing and want to be part of a community of people who feel the same. That’s all. I also hate to tell you that there are themed sex parties at Star Trek conventions too, so does that make being a Trekkie a kink? Is doing the Vulkan salute and telling someone to “live long and prosper” in public forcing that kink on others?

  • @ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6910 months ago

    Lawmaker: "If these flurries think they’re animals, we’re gonna treat them like animals! "

    Furries: “Yes, that’s exactly what we want.”

  • Maple Engineer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6010 months ago

    Moral panic.

    The right isn’t happy unless it’s panicked about some moral outrage. In the absence of anything to be panicked about they make things up to be panicked about.

    • @Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I just described this phenomenon to a friend of mine today. We were talking about how racism evolved by the same people to be disgust against gay/trans folk. I explained to him that conservatives require an outgroup to hate on in order to operate and be happy.

      This mother fucker took a second and said “Do you think modern conservative discrimination was caused by the fall of the Soviet union? I mean, when communism was a big threat everybody was united and happy hating the soviets”

      My boy really trying to paint the red scare as a good thing

    • @Globeparasite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -110 months ago

      the thing is if they solve the real stuff the don’t have anything to campaign next time

      (this work for all parties)

      • Maple Engineer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        both sides

        Really? What is the current moral panic of the Democrats?

        • @RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m personally unhappy with arms being sent to Israel workout approval of shitbox Congress (no typo), and how bad housing and food prices have gotten… But not really a panic, those are very real things.

          Not this anti-furry shaming bullshit. What a waste of people’s time for something hurting nobody.

          Almost as dumb as that (both sides) argument.

          • Maple Engineer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            510 months ago

            The high cost of living isn’t a moral panic. The satanic panic, the satanic messages in rock music panic, the drag queen sorry time panic, and the furry litter box panic are moral panics.

        • AgentOrangesicle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          The potential death of democracy is probably pretty forefront, but they certainly don’t focus on it enough.

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      3810 months ago

      He hit on a thicc furry who resoundingly rejected him and never let it go.

  • circuscritic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5110 months ago

    Can’t wait to see the reporting on the fallout from this, if it goes forward.

    Bureaucratic backlash from department heads at Animal Control, and however that chain of authority flows through in Oklahoma.

    Overzealous Animal Control officer who assaults a child that a school administrator called in for pickup.

    Mass student protests of dozens of kids going to school as furries

    And that’s just a few off the top of my head. The possibilities are endless.

    • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1910 months ago

      Mass student protests of dozens of kids going to school as furries

      This sounds like the kind of protest id participate in when I was in school. As a parent I’d totally wear a fur suit to pick up my kids as a form of protest

      • @evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2610 months ago

        For real, shit-disturbing teenage me would have immediately flipped from “furries are dumb and weird” to “what’s the minimum requirement to count as a furry” as soon as I found out that animal control would have to pick us up.

        The thought of an old-school dog catcher chasing me with a net while I ran away wearing floppy dog ears is just too amazing to pass up.

        What about a fish. Could I be a fish? Oh, what a time to be grown up and with kids of my own instead of being able to be a ridiculous jackass.

  • @Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5010 months ago

    Imagine if this passes and the next day the entire school staff dresses up as furries in protest. “Okay Timmy you see that person with the fox outfit on? That’s your teacher today.”

    honestly small children might love that

      • @skyspydude1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2010 months ago

        Yeah, a decent one is going to be $300-500. For a partial, the head is the most expensive part, and cheaping out on it is a great way to get some S-tier nightmare fuel. Full suits are minimum $1000, but I’d say a good one is at least double that, and they can go into the $5k+ range.

    • @gmhh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      I have a friend who makes mascot costumes. She and her husband sometimes wear them out for entertainment. Little kids absolutely ADORE seeing human-sized Pokemon walking around the mall, bowling alley, or the like.

    • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      I see all these silly rules being floated and part of me almost wishes I was back in high school so I could be really annoying.