• Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      That is a completely valid reason. There’s always the ballsack cats if you want to experience one.

      • stray@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 days ago

        The problem with cat allergies is their saliva, not the fur, so hairless cats are still a problem.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Personally, I’m more allergic to the litterbox dust and shit smell than fur or saliva.

          Also pretty sure it’s going to be subjective as to what will set someone’s allergies off, as allergies are extremely subjective.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        I have cat allergies, and I can tell you for a fact that I am still allergic to sphinx cats. Possibly even more so.

        It has never stopped me from interacting with cats though, I just have to try to remember to take a zyrtec or something before hand

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      I remember reading something a long time ago about parents telling their kids they were allergic to cats to keep from having a cat as a pet, and the kids growing up believing that only to one day discover it was never true.