• lemmyknow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    But… I’ve heard (from people online) nuking Japan was a necessary evil. Is that not the case? (I am big dummy and legit don’t know, suck at history. Though I am somewhat skeptical hearing potential USians say their violence was necessary)

    • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even after the bombs were dropped there was a coup attemptto overthrow Emperor Hirohito so that Japan could keep on fighting to the last man, woman and child.

      It was a necessary evil, but it was just that. Evil.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Japan could keep on fighting to the last man, woman and child.

        “fighting to the last man, woman and child” invokes a long-standing racist orientalism, with this notion of a super-honorable Japanese race who are incapable of making rational decisions - conveniently played up and accepted as gospel to justify the mass murder of a six-figure number of civilians whilst also painting them as not normal humans.

        • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Volunteer Fighting Corps conscripted all males aged 15-60 and all unmarried females aged 17-40

          Operation Downfall estimated casualties in the millions for both sides with the USA still using purple hearts that were made FOR Downfall

          It’s not racist to say that a society that would rather commit ritualistic suicide than spread shame or dishonour to their family would fight to the very bloody end than bear the shame of losing the war.

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            It’s not racist to say that a society that would rather commit ritualistic suicide than spread shame or dishonour to their family would fight to the very bloody end than bear the shame of losing the war.

            It’s dictionary definition racism. You’re attributing something that a small number of people in the country did, to the entire group. It doesn’t get any more racist than that.

            Your citations are poor as well, given the Allies also had conscription, and you’re citing Allied reports as though they could possibly be regarded as a reliable unbiased description of the Japanese.

            You’re using “I’m not racist but…” racism, to justify mass civilian murder. Have a word with yourself.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      Essentially, there were three options going into the second half of 1945: invasion, blockade, or the atomic bombings.

      Invasion and blockade both had projected casualties in the millions. So Truman made the decision to attempt to use the atomic bombs as a weapon of intimidation, dropping them and promising total destruction by the means of more such bombings if Japan did not surrender.

      I will never defend the firebombings over Japan, which did nothing to hasten the end of the war. But the atomic bomb was a new and devastating weapon which Truman, and much of US high command who were aware of its existence, correctly surmised would convince the Japanese government of the futility of further resistance (combined with a bluff that we had as many as we needed).

      Notably, even after the Soviet Union joined the war and both bombs had been dropped, a significant faction of the Japanese government wanted to keep fighting, even attempting a coup to continue the war. Only the direct intervention of Emperor Hirohito, a key figure in the State Shinto faith pushed by the Japanese Empire at the time, pushed the Japanese government to the negotiating table on terms less than “We keep our imperial conquests but say sowwy 😊”

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Is it not the case that the US favored the atomic bombs also because they saw that the USSR was carving a part of Europe into its sphere of influence and wanted to avoid the same happening in Japan?

        The Soviets were preparing a massive invasion and they had started moving into Manchuria about at the same time.

        Getting Japan to surrender now would allow the US to move in instead of the Soviets.

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think it had to be a sneak attack, because planes didn’t have the long range they have now, so warning your enemies about the bomb would enable the to prepare.