• xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m sure this is a woosh. Let me rephrase the thread.

            A can’t imagine a snake’s diaphragm.

            What diaphragm? (There is no diaphragm)

            Stupid silly! This is the diaphragm: [not the diaphragm we’re looking for]

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I had the same kneejerk reaction to the comment, until I checked the link. OP could have worked on their setup a bit better, and is doing themselves no favours by doubling down on it

                • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  And their comments weirdly get instant upvotes while everyone else’s (who got the sarcasm and got that you’re not actually being rude) is getting mixed votes. hmm…

                  I get that we have broader neurodivergence here but isn’t it too much for someone being THAT invested about being butthurt about a sarcastic joke?

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              If it’s a joke it’s a shitty joke.

              If it’s not you’re just doubling down.

              Barring all that being a douchebag to people who don’t “get” your brilliant fuckin joke is… Douchebag activity who could have guessed?

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I don’t need to it says it’s the contraceptive in the url.

                  No one didn’t get the shitty joke, people have an issue with the shitty way they set it up.

                  Here’s a fun one, did… did you read the rest of the comment chain before asking redundant questions?

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You’re clearly not checking usernames, you didn’t insult me.

                  No one asked you for anything boss so the answer would be nothing, find a way to not be a prick to setup a shitty joke i guess?

                  • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I know you weren’t the original person, and yet you’re clearly upset. I can only assume it’s because you felt personally insulted.

                    I think I’ll continue playing the fool to middling success. Feel free to stay endlessly angry to achieve the same result.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They’re saying snakes do not have diaphragms.

          Ed: it’s their own alt, they could have just said that and not reveled in the drama they caused but whatever.

          • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Access mostly relates to socioeconomic factors, but you’re largely correct. Use is notably higher in more affluent areas, but snakes are largely homeless and unsupported through reproductive legislation so that rarely matters.

        • littletoolshed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wtf, dude, I fucking lol’d at your joke, and I’m just floored at all the subsequent downvotes. I’m so sorry, I really only meant to trigger a fun conversation but something else happened… 🤷‍♂️😅

          • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You did nothing wrong! And you did, for better or worse. I still had fun learning about lemmy’s perception of irony. Actually, I wanted to know whether you had some specific way of filtering out AI anatomical images? My top 200 images are all AI or unrelated and it makes me sad. I misremembered who replied first. My b. Disregard. Unless…?