• paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would be a logical fallacy to jump to such a conclusion without interviewing a randomly sampled and much larger population. It is possible you may be correct or incorrect, but you are jumping to a conclusion about a topic with insufficient data to do so.

        • entwine413@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.

            • entwine413@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Nah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.

              • njm1314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Going through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  They haven’t made any numerical claim. The argument against biased data is a fundamental one. Arguing that someone’s methodology is wrong is not arguing that the opposite of the conclusion is true. They are just saying “Facebook research don’t count”. I don’t know what statistical evidence you need for “Facebook research don’t count”.

                • entwine413@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation.

                  The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.

                  • njm1314@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Considering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          The beautiful irony here is that you are believing in and spreading IDF propaganda for them.