• paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    It would be a logical fallacy to jump to such a conclusion without interviewing a randomly sampled and much larger population. It is possible you may be correct or incorrect, but you are jumping to a conclusion about a topic with insufficient data to do so.

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Going through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                They haven’t made any numerical claim. The argument against biased data is a fundamental one. Arguing that someone’s methodology is wrong is not arguing that the opposite of the conclusion is true. They are just saying “Facebook research don’t count”. I don’t know what statistical evidence you need for “Facebook research don’t count”.

              • entwine413@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation.

                The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Considering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The beautiful irony here is that you are believing in and spreading IDF propaganda for them.