Huh… that almost sounds like a public… good. Tickle me that.
What a monster! Making the lives of people better, like a maniac!
This is the future that those who are controlling the conservative platform are trying to prevent.
Make no mistake this is and always will be a class war about stealing the value of workers for their own personal gain.
Democrat leadership is also not happy with Mamdani. He isn’t following the rules, like David Hogg, or AOC.
Fuck the establishment Democratic Party reps, run them all out of office because they will never get it. We need a new deal not conservative appeasement.
100%
Democrat leadership is tepid dogwater
That’s some poor propaganda, comrade fox news. You should’ve rendered it in Arabic or Chinese to scare them out
Americans will just go “this guy wants to instate free healthcare, cleanse police corruption, and to stop bombing the middle east!” and expect you to reel back in disgust.
Because their MAGAt base will in fact reel back in disgust if any of those things are proposed. If “the libs” want it, then MAGA is programmed to hate it.
See how the fox piece looks? It has the politicians face, then they let MAGA know the guy is a “lib”, likely with the set up talking points. That is all MAGAts need, a face and to know the person is on the other side … from there anything else mentioned about the person is automatically bad.
In 3 years Fox news will just show a picture of the political opponent’s face with the caption “this guy is a lib” which will send every MAGAt into a murderous rage
I remember seeing video of a MAGAt rally. Trump vs. Biden election. They had a picture of Hillary up on the screen while the MAGATs chanted “lock her up”. I didn’t get it. She wasn’t running … it made no sense.
Like Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984
I’m just envisioning it like a John Wick style contract being issued when Fox News does the bit and every magat’s phone starts going off with the notification… I don’t want this timeline…
In this case all they needed to know he’s bad is to hear his name unfortunately.
Groupthink is a real thing
and its evolved over the last few decades.
Fox News saw the two minutes of hate and thought “why only two minutes?”
Here’s how I think they see this:
Landlords will go out of business. For-profit grocery stores will go out of business. People I don’t know won’t suffer (there’s even more letters at the end and I don’t know what they mean; that scares me). Businesses will have to pay more to operate, therefore prices will rise for me to protect profits. Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.
Conservatives are fearful. They think when someone gets something good, it’s by taking from them. Fuck 'em.
Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.
They don’t even try to hide their racism anymore.
Look at this monster.
Access to food, transportation, housing, it’s almost like he thinks the job of government is providing decent infrastructure.
Or “insur[ing] domestic Tranquility,…promot[ing] the general welfare.” The Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves.
General Welfare, sir! o7
OOOOH, he had “Welfare” in his name, must be a woke liberal!
You know they’re mad
Yes but many of these would require taxing the rich, which I’m against because I might somehow become rich one day through virtually no effort or understanding of how one becomes rich to begin with
/s
That’s it right there. Just mentioning the phrase tax the rich has become enough of a catalyst for the punching down to intensify. Keep the pressure on.
People act like $30/hr is high. Note this would be the mayor of NYC, so it would be raised for NYC only if he got his way. The cheapest place you can get to live on your own there I am finding is 2600 a month. So say you made 30/hr. That’s $62,400 working 40 hours a week. Take out Federal/state/city taxes ends up being around $46,112 take home. The place costed $31,200. Making the lowest rent findable in Manhattan 2/3 of $30/hr.
They wouldn’t be able to get approved to even live there if they tried. They would have to rent a room from someone else with a 4 bedroom place renting to 4 people for around $1200/ month. And share bathrooms/kitchen/living space with people. And they would still struggle to get by if they paid for health insurance, travel costs to and from work, food, and the whole living crap.
$30 isn’t radical for NYC, it’s like base needed salary… And hope you have a good stable relationship with someone else making the same, then maybe you can get your own place together, just don’t do something stupid like get pregnant because you can’t afford to not go to work, and can’t afford to put them in daycare so you would both have to uproot and move real quick finding jobs elsewhere.
Wait, we are gonna vote for a guy who is going to make renting a room more affordable?! COMMUNISM!! I WONT STAND FOR SUCH LUXURY LIVING CONDITIONS! /s
It says $30 by 2030. What is the term for Mayor? Is he promising something that literally cannot be done by him?
Minimum wage is current around $16 there. Standardly you put a plan in place with a set date and partial increases up to that day to allow companies time to plan and get ready. For instance the last time federal minimum wage increased, it rolled out as such
"The 2007 amendments increased the minimum wage to $5.85 per hour effective July 24, 2007; $6.55 per hour effective July 24, 2008; and $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009. "
7.25 was what they said they were going to go to, but rolled it out slowly to prepare everyone.
16-30 in a 4 year roll out makes sense
Wow, insane that it’s that low right now. Minimum wage in Seattle is $20.76 and grows based on inflation every year. It’s grown from $15 in 2017.
I’m seriously shocked the Fox media team didn’t bother photoshopping horns on his head, distorting his pleasant, lovely smile into a menacing grimace, or altering his skin color into the brimstone-red spectrum.
Or, to be even more crude, him as a caricature of Mohamad.
(Please don’t ban me mods, we live in a world where this could actually happen on national TV).
Jesus would NEVER Approve of ANY of these! AFFORDABLE housing? Jesus would BURN it to The Ground! PROTECTING your Neighbor? LAUGHABLE! This is the MOST Anti Jesus Platform EVER! Where’s the ELIMINATING Healthcare? Where’s the ELIMINATING Homes? Where’s the HURTING your Neighbors? Where’s the JESUS!
Its crazy that NYC still can’t afford free public transportation. City literally has more expensive apartments than yearly cost of operating busses.
Free buses aren’t something you really need to “afford” because even in smaller cities the economic value returned through that way of operating is given back and then some. Like, they’ve been throwing free money on the ground for decades upon decades and it’s about time shit catches up to reality.
Bus fares make up only like 2% of the income for my cities public transit system. They can afford to go free.
Right but I think you’ve missed my entire point somehow. Literally it is cheaper to not charge anything for transit. You don’t need to afford it, you just have to do it. It is free money, understand?
The point is you need pretext to remove people who use the system as a living room instead of transit.
Sure but why would a fee do that? If anything that would encourage this behavior because if I pay 2$ I feel entitled to spend there as much time as I want.
This is pretty well established theory now in behavior economy:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_crowding_theory
We already invented the most effective and humane fix for this - social workers. I don’t think anything can work better then another person trained in handling social situations correcting the issue themselves.
City owned grocery shops? I…wut. This breaks my mind. Not in WTF is this way, just how would this work. Curious how it will come out and hoping for the best.
The city owns and runs the grocery stores. They’re not required to make huge profits and can therefore offer reasonable prices. They can buy directly from local suppliers, thus creating or securing local jobs. Basically, if you cut out all the bloodsuckers, things become much better.
Public grocery stores are a useful solution to food deserts without forcing high wages or ideologically preferred suppliers. It is a zero cost option in that the stores can sustain themselves. It is a big benefit to neighbourhoods and property owners in those neighbourhoods.
The thing is, actual capitalist theory suggests it wouldn’t “cut out” bloodsuckers at all. It would force them to compete but they would survive, presumably just fine.
A public option is definitely a socialist platform, but unless the government stores are allowed to operate at a loss indefinitely, supplemented by tax dollars, they pose NO real threat to those businesses, only to greedy gouging.
I don’t think the idea is to eliminate ‘regular’ corporate owned grocery stores. I think it’s meant to be an alternative that offers cheaper food for people who need that. NYC has a pretty high standard of living, I am sure there will be plenty of people who can still afford to shop at the corporate grocery stores because they are more conveniently located or maybe the selection if better, and I’m sure some will shop there just so they don’t have to interact with poor people.
If there was a functioning market economy, none of this shit would be necessary in the first place.
It’s a pilot program for a few stores.
The city currently has a program where they’re paying private grocery stores to try and mitigate food deserts, but there’s so few strings attached it’s just free money to the shops.
He’s proposing ending that, and using the money to directly open grocery stores in food deserts run as city owned coops.
It’s not infringing on private business because they’re not operating in these areas anyway.
There are already gov. owned stores in some states (liquor stores, but that’s close enough).
