Days after Ohio voters passed Issue 1 and codified abortion rights into Ohio’s constitution, Republicans are not accepting the election results.

In a new, unhinged press release issued by the Ohio House Republican Committee, GOP members rant that “foreign billionaires” impacted the election results and call the results tainted by so-called “foreign interference.” It is unclear what they are referring to.

Ohio voters overwhelmingly voted ‘Yes’ on Issue 1 by a margin of 56.6% to 43.4%.

The press release further argues that the results of the election do not invalidate a 6-week abortion ban previously passed by the Ohio Legislature and that “no amendment can overturn the God given rights with which we were born.”

  • @Bananigans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1411 year ago

    “no amendment can overturn the God given rights with which we were born.”

    …so, no birth no problem then?

    • @gkd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      341 year ago

      The really weird part was this:

      The amendment’s language is dangerously vague and unconstrained, and can be weaponized to attack parental rights or defend rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers.

      I mean I know that they love to mix things together, but this might be the first time I’ve seen abortion linked to pedophilia and supporting rapists.

      • @Bananigans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        It’s just buzz phrase salad that they serve with every issue. Biden=pedo, immigrants=rapists, trans=rapist, abortion=trafficking, literally any issue=just add a,b, or c for justification. It’s a tired recipe, but their customers enjoy it.

          • @Bananigans@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And they would be laughed out of court and into prison. It’s not the fault of the law if someone reads it and understands it to mean something it doesn’t say.

            It doesn’t have any language repealing pedophilia laws. Just for clarity.

          • @TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            I don’t see this part as vague as all.

            …one’s own reproductive decisions,…

            Your own, not someone elses. If you’re a kiddy diddler abusing a child, then you’re affecting their reproductive decisions since they are under the age of consent. That defense isn’t covered under this amendment. So it would go through the courts as normal. Hopefully ending in a lifetime sentence.

          • shastaxc
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The interpretation of the law is up to the judicial branch and any judge who sides with the pedophile in this case is kissing his career goodbye.

    • cori <3 (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      I’m pretty sure they meant that line as a reference to their own god-given right to impose their will on everyone else.

  • @Taco2112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1251 year ago

    It’s really funny when they whine about outside money. I didn’t see the GOP up in arms as Citizens United passed, I don’t see them upset when they SuperPACs give money to their campaigns so it seems they only care when it affects them, big fucking shocker there….

  • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    991 year ago

    Please proceed.

    You just got pounded at the polls over this issue. Please keep the rage levels high.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    731 year ago

    Pay attention, people. Recognize who you need to vote for in 2024 to preserve the rights that YOU HAVE ALREADY VOTED FOR…

    • Ænima
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      They already set the stage to ignore the election results next year. Look at how many STILL think the 2020 election results were stolen. They’re either enacting laws to overturn the future results they didn’t like or commandeer the offices that handle elections to ignore them.

      This time next year will be a very dangerous time for the United States. Even if every sane Republican voter, who recognizes the dangers proposed, votes for a Democrat, it may not even matter. I’m not looking forward to it…

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Yeah, I don’t think most people truly grok how pivotal this is going to be. Yeah, they may say the whole “this is the most important election of your life” like they say every time (and it has been every time, unfortunately), but I don’t know how many people truly understand what’s coming.

        • Ænima
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          That’s why they haven’t stopped saying it about 2020. Repeat a lie enough and it becomes true…

      • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Nah. It’s hard to ignore an election in the US because the one thing Americans hate is feeling impotent.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh
      link
      fedilink
      -3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Mmmmm, if preserving your “democracy”(don’t laugh!) means having to “choose” between two genociders(lmao), then I’d rather your country fell instead. Put up someone who’s actually against fossil fuels, actually against the killer cops in our society, and actually against the exponentially-expanding military-industrial complex, then we can talk. Not a second beforehand; 'cause on David if y’all put up Genocide Joe “I’m gonna tell Charlamagne the God he’s not Black if he’s not for me” Biden again, I’ll be laughing as I withhold.

      Matter of fact? Democrats don’t even get to talk about the potential of getting my vote until the RICO charges against the Stop Cop City activists get dropped. If it never happens, then fuck y’all, die slow and nameless.

  • Arghblarg
    link
    fedilink
    641 year ago

    WTF America. Don’t you have some sort of neutral House Constable with powers to kick out these idiots in cases like this? How can they just ignore official results without consequence?

    It sounds like there needs to be a bottom-to-top reform of the law where every ‘norm’ that used to be assumed, gets new enforceable law to back it up.

    • @nul9o9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t you have some sort of neutral House Constable with powers to kick out these idiots in cases like this?

      No, we have an impartial judiciary system that… oh wait…

    • xenu
      link
      fedilink
      291 year ago

      The Republicans think they have a right to rule us without our consent. Sooner or later the military may have to get involved.

        • @DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why do you think Tuberville is holding 400+ appointments hostage until the GOP likely takes the senate back?

          It’s part of project 2025 to have insurrectionists in the millitary who would support a theocratic coup

        • xenu
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          It’s a wild card, I’m not saying otherwise. The alternative though, could very well be a right wing authoritarian take over. My hope is enough of these guys saw Iraq or Afghanistan to know what it would look like.

        • Ænima
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Conservative or not, those of us who served, and didn’t just sit behind a desk, know the oath we took. I think you would be surprised how many service members hold that shit in higher regard than a politician’s butthurt response to election results.

        • @Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The military is full of poor people. What do think will happen if you start turning them on their own families?

          Not saying youre wrong but makes as much sense as your “actually conservative” theory.

    • @Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      There is no neutral role, everything can be made partisan.

      If the people don’t like the actions of an elected official, they can either try to vote them out in the next election or try to force a recall and replace them.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        “No election can overturn our god given right to ignore your rights”

        • Republicans
      • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The federal Constitution prevents any state from recalling a member of congress, so your federal reps can not be recalled legally. They would have to be expelled from within the congress, you get to vote and thats it.

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Don’t shrug your shoulders and say “I guess we’ll wait until the next election.” They have shown what they think of election results.

        Take note of how the French do things and fucking protest!

    • @Igloojoe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Articles like this are just to make republican voters stop crying. Give them hope while also selling a news article.

      Abortion rights will go in effect, and the election results will stay.

      • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Based on what? This wouldn’t be the first time Republicans ignored a constitutional amendment and got away with it.

      • @hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Exactly.

        These chucklefucks got elected on conservative social repression. Now that it’s been rejected, this is a desperate plea to their base not to primary them out next term.

  • @evidences@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    541 year ago

    The party of Lincoln sure doesn’t seem like they want a Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

    The most worrying part of this press release is the part where they’re saying they’re going to try and reign in the powers of the judiciary to enforce the abortion amendment. Sure sounds a lot like fascism to me.

  • @Vlhacs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    521 year ago

    I’m sure some of their Republican voters will be thrilled to hear that…

    Oh by the way, I thought the GOP were about state rights?

    • Baron Von J
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      L’etat c’est moi.

      They believe that they are the state, and that they should have absolute authority to rule over the residents without any federal government oversight.

    • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Their stated ideals are ad-hoc justifications. All that has ever mattered is ingroup loyalty. They think that’s all you’re doing, because they think that’s all there is.

      Please stop asking these kind of questions, even sarcastically.

  • @Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    Hey Republicans. Prove your specific god exists, and I’ll recognize that you have god-given rights.

    In the meantime, we have real, objective proof that you lost and need to STFU.

  • @DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes someone posted this on Lemmy so now I can say what I want…

    ….maybe someone needs to revoke their license to living?

    If they want to rule like kings than they can be treated as such

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure after writing his Bible, Jesus spent several weeks consulting at Wharton really locking down the supply side theory.