weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 5 个月前The duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1614arrow-down111
arrow-up1603arrow-down1imageThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 5 个月前message-square31linkfedilink
minus-squaremoodylinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 个月前You don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 个月前No that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 个月前And the ambiguity fits bisexuality better anyway. It’s useful too. You can use it to cut the knot on the bi-vs-pan debate, for example, or avoid silly arguments about gender distribution of partners, or say “nunya,” etc.
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 个月前Sometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.
You don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
No that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
And the ambiguity fits bisexuality better anyway. It’s useful too. You can use it to cut the knot on the bi-vs-pan debate, for example, or avoid silly arguments about gender distribution of partners, or say “nunya,” etc.
Sometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.