weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 19 hours agoThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1476arrow-down17
arrow-up1469arrow-down1imageThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 19 hours agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squaremoodylinkfedilinkarrow-up4·13 hours agoYou don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoNo that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoSometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.
You don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
No that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
Sometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.