ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Chaotic Good@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 9 days agoThe timing of the murdersopuli.xyzimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up11.52Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.51Karrow-down1imageThe timing of the murdersopuli.xyzByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Chaotic Good@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square106linkfedilink
minus-squareHalfSalesman@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 days agoIf your default assumption is that this event: Did not cause an immediate “panic” reduction in insurance denials, even briefly. Even if it did, that this happening did not save anyone’s life. You are just coping because the idea of killing someone ending up saving lives makes you feel icky. Even if this is just an anecdote, I find the contrary claim harder to believe.
minus-squareparodylinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 days agoIDK if the people actually denying claims were scared enough to change their behavior, well plausible enough ya Wonder if any updated guidance went out to them at any point, written or not
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·8 days agoMy default assumption is that this is a shit argument and the people who push it are dishonest fools. There is no (2). There is no second part to this stance, you haven’t presented any evidence yet and you’re posturing as if it’s 100% true.
If your default assumption is that this event:
Did not cause an immediate “panic” reduction in insurance denials, even briefly.
Even if it did, that this happening did not save anyone’s life.
You are just coping because the idea of killing someone ending up saving lives makes you feel icky.
Even if this is just an anecdote, I find the contrary claim harder to believe.
IDK if the people actually denying claims were scared enough to change their behavior, well plausible enough ya
Wonder if any updated guidance went out to them at any point, written or not
My default assumption is that this is a shit argument and the people who push it are dishonest fools. There is no (2). There is no second part to this stance, you haven’t presented any evidence yet and you’re posturing as if it’s 100% true.