He’s pretty much describing all three sides of the problem and pretending only one of them matters.
The anti-democracy movement, which wants a dictator and has gained enough followers to actually pull it off through democratic means.
The pro-democracy movement, which is seeking to counteract the fascists through persuasion (the whining he’s talking about) and careful legal action that doesn’t undermine the very democracy they’re trying to defend.
The revolutionary movement, which believes this democracy has already failed so severely that it needs a hard reset, so any action to remove the fascists is justified even if there is collateral damage.
He’s pretty much describing all three sides of the problem and pretending only one of them matters.
Stop making sense!