• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    This leave out the most egregious thing they are doing: installing Starlink backdoors all over government.

    At best, Elon and his team are making sure that he has unfettered access to all the data for his AI shenanigans. But where is the data being held? How do we know Elon’s backdoor has not, itself, been backdoored?

    At worst, he is actively selling it all to foreign powers.

    There is zero accountability, so we really dont know…

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Boy howdy, what a head scratcher!

    I swear to fucking god the intentional obliviousness of the vast majority of our media apparatus is going to fucking kill us all

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But at the same time I feel like it reflects the obliviousness of the vast majority of the population. The election in the US kinda proved that. So if anything, mentioning it as often as possible is probably the best call.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s partially an ego thing for Musk. I work with tons of these dunning Kruger techbro types who think they know better than everyone else and will eat a lot of shit to “prove” it. They have a chip on their shoulder because they think their engineering degree should give them some mythical status and get increasingly agitated when nobody fucking cares.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    My first instinct when I saw this was “anyone with a brain already knows this.” But after a little bit of extra thought I remembered what the average person thinks and how the average person voted last election and I was like “yeah, we should probably talk about this as much as possible.”

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    https://archive.ph/1sC0H

    There are many, many theories on this. In March, Alex Nowrasteh and Ryan Bourne of the libertarian Cato Institute tried to organize them into “six theoretical models for understanding DOGE’s action to date”:

    1. DOGE is seeking to purge progressive influence within the federal government.
    2. DOGE is a scaled-up public version of Musk’s style of corporate restructuring applied to the federal government.
    3. DOGE is the first step of a public relations campaign to build popular support for spending cuts.
    4. DOGE is an essential component of a Trump administration legal challenge to expand the president’s power of impoundment.
    5. DOGE provides political cover for Congress to be even more fiscally irresponsible.
    6. DOGE is about self-interest and cronyism.
    7. DOGE is building a surveillance state or, if you prefer, a less-siloed government.
  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Without exaggeration, this may be the stupidest chart I’ve ever seen in my life.

    Trend line of Musk spending cut promises

    A declining trend line of Musk’s spending cut promises means by end of year he’ll apparently start promising $2T in new spending by DOGE according to these geniuses.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “Source: News reports” is the funniest part. It’s like submitting a scientific paper and saying your source is “microscopes and shit.”

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If you’d actually bothered to read any of the words, you’d have realized that this was done tongue-in-cheek.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Reminds me of the old xkcd where a guy tells a bride on her wedding day that, extrapolating from that day’s events, within two months she’ll have four dozen husbands.

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    The stupidity of anyone asking this all innocent like Of course it’s not for efficiency it’s a fucking coup and massive corruption wake the fuck up media

  • blakenong
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Money is worthless. Data is the new money. In a time when your dollar is worth a penny, you can still sell data like gold.