• Breezy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why dont they just lease them to people and be paid by the electricity generated. Then when its paid off the owner gets the profits.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Power station vendors have a solution for US. Smart plugs that never backflow to grid. US utility monopolies hate solar, but the most friendly solar regulation possible is low fixed monthly fees for low amp inflow cap (with high per kwh rates), or permission for homes to be off grid.

    Even with forced grid connections, there is a ROI case for self consumption only solar that requires no grid permissions for no grid sell back/credits. Powerstations are a fairly easy method, for portable power that can be rearranged in home, including DC power efficiency benefits. Multiple power stations can deal with shading and multiple panel orientations, can deal with power outages, and provide emergency power in rooms where needed or fully mobile power. EVs can ensure you never have too much power stored, and while TOU rates still favour overnight charging, even (morning) kitchen needs can be shifted to solar or minimal/optimal grid charging.

    Tariffs are a big obstacle for US now, but rest of Americas has similar grid. If consumers get extorted from data center demand preference, it is further reason to seek escape.

  • meyotch@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Part is regulations. Utah, of all places, recently passed legislation that requires utilities to allow small solar systems to plug into home systems without an application or fee from the utility.

    up to 1200kWac

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Where I live, you can buy solar, but the energy isn’t yours. You can’t install a battery and the energy generated only gets you a discount, but never gets you below zero. Essentially you’re buying the energy company some equipment for a discount on your bill.

    • hash@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The other part is lack of tenant rights. Which Utah will not be a leader on anytime soon. Our leases have half page long restrictions on what can and can’t be on your balcony and the legislature isn’t about to back up renters.

  • blakenong
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I don’t understand why people won’t pay outrageous prices for something that can only charge a laptop during an economic collapse”

    • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lol. The article is underselling them a bit. 800W does a bit more than that.

      Btw. prices have become pretty low. So it’s worth it if you have the space. Not sure what you mean with economic collapse, though.

      • GluWu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’m an engineer that worked in solar for a bit. You will not get 800w out of vertical panels on your balcony.

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is why I have 2 kWp, on the roof. Suboptimal orientation, some afternoon shading so only 4.5 kWh/day longterm average.

          Vertical is good for the winter. Vertical free standing bifacials are surprisingly good year over, because of better convection cooling and reflection, especially from snow or water.

        • Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It depends on the balcony. I could get that on mine pretty easily, but it would mean basically closing the entire thing off.

      • blakenong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure what I mean by economic collapse?

        You’re making a joke, right?

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            They offload some of your electrical usage to a free source to lower your bill and help the environment. Its not a replacement for grid electricity. Its a supplement. Since it seems like whoever you were replying to thought these were supposed to power your whole house.

          • blakenong
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            I’m not insinuating anything. I’m suggesting they cost a lot and the power they give is not worth the investment. If they were significantly lower and cost or significantly higher in power, regardless of being able to fully power your home, then they might be a better solution.

            But you were commenting on my comment of economic collapse which is laughing at the person who suggested that nothing’s wrong. So, they are eithernot paying attention to anything or dumb as fuck

            • eleitl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              They pay for themselves in two years or less. Legal 800 W feed-in limited still allow for 2 kWp total module power and increasingly there are buffer batteries.

        • I think the people replying to you aren’t properly parsing your comment. To rephrase it for these folks:

          “I don’t understand why -during an economic collapse- people won’t pay outrageous prices for something that can… charge a laptop”

          I.e., it shouldn’t be surprising that people aren’t going to spend a bunch of money on something nearly useless when our economy is actively collapsing

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I still don’t understand these. Like I would think you need a batter system that could handle the grid to begin with.

    • eleitl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They inject power into your local single phase circuit, with surplus escaping into the grid. Where it gets no farther than to the next consumer. There are kits with few kWh buffer battery which can aim for zero feed in if you’re not feeling altruistic.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I thought you could not send power into the grid without a setup to shutdown in case someone is working on the grid or something like that.

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          The solar inverter shuts down in milliseconds if it detects that mains power is gone. The reason for it is the one you cited.

          This behaviour can be changed with a different firmware.