The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 3 days agoWhich Animals Could You Beat in a Fight?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square197linkfedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down14
arrow-up1228arrow-down1imageWhich Animals Could You Beat in a Fight?lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square197linkfedilink
minus-squareglitch1985@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoIt would be difficult to fight anything without arms. I guess you could just do roundhouse kicks but arms would be much more useful.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoThats why the brits have an advantage, all that.soccer helps their kick attacks. Americans obviously overrate themselves by what ever percent they think they can beat an elephant, bear, or gorrila.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·2 days agoCorrect, my whole point is it’s vague enough to take advantage of so it’s not actually indicative of much aside from malicious compliance.
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoI feel like unarmed is not vague enough to allow for machine guns lol
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-22 days ago“if you were unarmed” I’m unarmed, the fellas i hire may not be but that isn’t the question.
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoYou were super fun on the playground I’m sure
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·2 days agoThis isn’t the playground, I’m not sure your point. Ask an inane questions I’m going to give you absurdist but logical answers. That said, I haven’t met a single person who has said that who doesn’t themselves seem insufferable.
minus-squareerin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoOh boy. It was a joke.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoYeah i think we all get that as that’s what it usually is and I stand by my point.
It would be difficult to fight anything without arms. I guess you could just do roundhouse kicks but arms would be much more useful.
Thats why the brits have an advantage, all that.soccer helps their kick attacks.
Americans obviously overrate themselves by what ever percent they think they can beat an elephant, bear, or gorrila.
Correct, my whole point is it’s vague enough to take advantage of so it’s not actually indicative of much aside from malicious compliance.
I feel like unarmed is not vague enough to allow for machine guns lol
“if you were unarmed”
I’m unarmed, the fellas i hire may not be but that isn’t the question.
You were super fun on the playground I’m sure
This isn’t the playground, I’m not sure your point. Ask an inane questions I’m going to give you absurdist but logical answers.
That said, I haven’t met a single person who has said that who doesn’t themselves seem insufferable.
Oh boy. It was a joke.
Yeah i think we all get that as that’s what it usually is and I stand by my point.