• greenfire
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        16 hours ago

        if the law is on their side, why are they wearing masks?

          • mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            https://www.employmentlawletter.com/2025/01/what-organizations-should-know-about-ice-enforcement-actions/

            https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/resources/ice_warrants_summary.pdf

            DHS issues writs for ICE but since there is no court hearing these cases, there is no warrant that ICE can obtain. The DOJ has said there is no warrant required…which is spurious as that goes against the 4th amendment. ICE will call a writ a warrant, and often journalists will write what they’re told. See these articles regarding a different arrest below

            https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ice+mahmoud&t=fpas&ia=web

            • n2burns@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              That doesn’t say anything about this case. Given it wasn’t just ICE involved, it’s possible that a judicial warrant was obtained.

              • mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                There is not a court that ICE has access to that will issue a valid warrant. This is why the DOJ just said it doesn’t matter if there is a warrant or not. ICE is flagrantly defying the 4th amendment. That other case, ICE can be heard in a recording telling Mahmoud’s wife that they have a warrant. Now they say that they never had/needed one in the first place.

                The issue is that ICE cannot legally get a warrant for the people they are choosing to detain as they focus on families. The “dangerous criminals” that have real warrants, those are usually served/executed by the FBI, Marshalls, or local SWAT. I don’t know if you live in the US like I do, but this is a pretty serious issue as again, these writs are not warrants, ICE does not have access to a warrant as that’s not how our courts are set up nor is it how their department was set up.

                Both of the resources I listed at the top of my response explain this in depth. The last link I shared was for context.

      • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Are those even legit anymore? Any idiot judge (or DOGE script kiddie pretending to be one) can sign one.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I’m just responding the the meme asking Police to come back with a warrant

      • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Law enforcement officers have a duty of care. If they execute a no knock warrant at an address that is no longer valid and get shot in the process it is likely there would be no criminal culpability for the homeowner if it’s in a castle doctrine state.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Does lemmy have a sub for badlegaladvice? This comment feels like a prime candidate :)

          • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            If there was, I didn’t see it but as the Executive will find out if there was, it’s not up to them, it’s up to the Judicial.

            The person currently occupying the White House is not a king. Much as he might like to believe otherwise.

            I’m a law abiding citizen of the United States. If someone breaks into my home have every reason to believe they’re hostile and won’t hesitate to use deadly force to protect myself and my family.

            • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              12 hours ago

              is not a king

              Even if be were called “King” rather than “President”, the Constitution is still a thing. He can call himself whatever, really.

              Funny thing is, many citizens of the US seem to have less rights and priviledges than subjects of the UK.

        • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Just as there is no for cops murdering pretty much anyone for anything on the clock. “Standing your ground” to these bastards is plain playing with fire. If you’re not perfectly white and very lucky, you’ll be just signing your own death warrant.