• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Well, at a low level they are still basically the same. x86 still starts in 16-bit real mode. Mice still use USB 1 from the 90s.

      Mostly it’s just a lot faster and covered with more layers of abstraction.

      • legion02@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        But you don’t know what I mean. Computers as most people know them now are tablets and cell phones. I blame X and the elder millennials for that.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Computers filled rooms back when the boomers (and earlier gens) were creating them, so even a desktop isn’t how they were known then. But it laid the groundwork.

          • legion02@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Was Franklin laying the groundwork for computers as we know them when he discovered electricity? You have to cut things off somewhere for a statement like that.

            • samus12345@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It could be said so, but it’s a much, much more distant connection than working on things that are literally called “computers.”

              • legion02@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                So then the Greek Antikythera mechanism counts too then? Or maybe the Bell transistor. My point is that none of these things resemble computers as we know them.