There’s a sonic boom coming from those goalposts because they are moving so fast. You asked for an example of something in nature having more than 2 sexes because you originally said that there are only 2 sexes in the natural world.
But anyway, let’s change your requirement and make the definition of sex being only applicable to organisms that only produce one set of gametes.
But wait! It’s a disorder, so it doesn’t count, right? Ask yourself why it is a disorder. The reason is that humans have decided that there are only two sexes. It’s circular reasoning. There are two sexes, so when someone comes along who is neither or both, they don’t count because they should be one or the other. Why should they be one or the other? Because there are two sexes. And round and round we go. It’s faulty logic.
Nature produces people who by your own definition are neither male or female. It is you who decided there are exactly two sexes. Nature doesn’t care about definitions that humans apply to try to shoehorn things into categories, it just does its own thing.
The goal posts didn’t move. Fungi don’t have more than 2 sexes, they have more than 2 mating types. Fungi don’t even have a sex. This was clearly explained in my post and backed up with facts. Here is another article explaining how you’re wrong about fungi, with a dozen scientific and biology sources:
No person has ever produced both gametes, and hilariously your own link confirms this.
No one has ever been both sexes or neither. No one. Ever. In the history of the world, out of billions of people. Not a single one. Your reading and comprehension skills are absolutely diabolical, that’s the biggest takeaway from all of this.
Also an aside - Wikipedia is not a trusted source.
There’s a sonic boom coming from those goalposts because they are moving so fast. You asked for an example of something in nature having more than 2 sexes because you originally said that there are only 2 sexes in the natural world.
But anyway, let’s change your requirement and make the definition of sex being only applicable to organisms that only produce one set of gametes.
By that definition, there are people who do not have a sex because their body produces both types. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovotesticular_syndrome
But wait! It’s a disorder, so it doesn’t count, right? Ask yourself why it is a disorder. The reason is that humans have decided that there are only two sexes. It’s circular reasoning. There are two sexes, so when someone comes along who is neither or both, they don’t count because they should be one or the other. Why should they be one or the other? Because there are two sexes. And round and round we go. It’s faulty logic.
Nature produces people who by your own definition are neither male or female. It is you who decided there are exactly two sexes. Nature doesn’t care about definitions that humans apply to try to shoehorn things into categories, it just does its own thing.
The goal posts didn’t move. Fungi don’t have more than 2 sexes, they have more than 2 mating types. Fungi don’t even have a sex. This was clearly explained in my post and backed up with facts. Here is another article explaining how you’re wrong about fungi, with a dozen scientific and biology sources:
https://www.theparadoxinstitute.com/watch/do-fungi-have-thousands-of-sexes
No person has ever produced both gametes, and hilariously your own link confirms this.
No one has ever been both sexes or neither. No one. Ever. In the history of the world, out of billions of people. Not a single one. Your reading and comprehension skills are absolutely diabolical, that’s the biggest takeaway from all of this.
Also an aside - Wikipedia is not a trusted source.