(this is a sarcastic post meant to highlight the absurdity of some of the “greater good” rhetoric we’ve been hearing, especially around leaving vulnerable populations like disabled people behind in case of revolution, basically accelerationism)

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Lincoln didn’t run on ending slavery, but plenty of abolitionists supported him, including Frederick Douglas

      Douglass was also very involved in national politics, and as the presidential election of 1860 approached, he advocated for candidates with strong antislavery platforms. American voters received a ballot crowded with four candidates: Abraham Lincoln (Republican), John C. Breckenridge (Southern Democrat), Stephen A. Douglas (Democrat), and John Bell (Constitutional Union). Douglas’s belief in “popular sovereignty,” Breckenridge’s pro-slavery platform, and Bell’s aversion to the issue entirely left Frederick Douglass to endorse Lincoln and the Republicans, whom he believed were more antislavery than the divided Democrats.

    • parody
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s possible to be willing to jump in front of a bullet to save a trans brother and loudly tell everyone to shut the fuck up about sports until we codify the right protections into the constitution etc.

      Back channels baby! Back channel fights on controversial topics. Fox News can’t demonize what they’re ignorant of.

      But this is assuming this topic is popular on the left and it’s reportedly divisive (again, amongst those who are not hateful scumbags)

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you think that you can change the Constitution through back channels, then I need to know what you’re smoking.

        • parody
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Backchannel until [super]majority agreement achieved before going public!

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Back channels! Where you can say you’re doing something but aren’t actually doing shit!

        Back channels are the only place where democrats oppose genocide, support unions, try to keep abortion legal, and are diligently working to make cannabis legal.