Ah yes, they’ll surely maintain the 14km wall for decades to come!
Fuck Suncor and their rich-assed, oil-addicted leadership.
And fuck the feds and provincial gov’ts for even allowing this stupidity in 2002.
Hear that kids? They made a vow. That’s like a double plus pinky swear. It’s definitely ok.
I want to see the kind of bond they put up around damage.
It should be in the trillions.
It won’t be, but it should be.
They’re going to rip up that wetlands. Foul up the water. And once they’re done sucking the ground dry they’ll say “we’re outta here” and Alberta is going to scream at the Feds for not doing enough for Alberta and the rest of Canada is going to end up having to pay the massive bill to contain the environmental damage.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
This may not be the case for future generations, she said, if energy giant Suncor moves ahead with a plan to expand its Fort Hills oilsands facility to mine part of the lake’s adjacent wetland.
McClelland Lake in northern Alberta is at once an important gathering place for local First Nations, a carbon sink, a wildlife habitat and a major potential source of bitumen.
CBC News has obtained a copy of a recent presentation made by a technical advisory group for the project that expresses concern and frustration with how the company will monitor the unmined part of the wetland and ensure it’s kept safe from the impacts of mining.
Suncor declined an interview with CBC News while the Alberta Energy Regulator considers a request from a conservation group to reconsider the project, but it has said in correspondence that its plan is based on years of consultation and expert knowledge.
CBC News has obtained a copy of an October PowerPoint presentation that was made by the committee’s technical advisory group, whose backgrounds include wetland hydrogeology, ecology and aquatic chemistry.
In correspondence to the province’s energy regulator, Suncor has disputed the objections raised by the Alberta Wilderness Association, saying these concerns are based on false assumptions, are unsupported by evidence or otherwise demonstrate a lack of expertise.
The original article contains 1,629 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 87%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
