• TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cool… AOC is leading in the polls about an imaginary election taking place more than 3 years from now. Meanwhile yesterday I spent $116 on groceries and didn’t even need help carrying them up the stairs.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      $116 of groceries that you can carry up the stairs‽ So like, a few bananas, an avocado, and some stale bread (no toasting required)? Quit bitching, you’re spending wayyy over your means, obviously! Lemme guess, you occasionally enjoy cheese as well. Have you tried $116 worth of beans instead?.. I bet not, you bougie peasant

      • omega_x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Importing that avocado is the real problem, should have picked up a Florida orange and a Georgia peach instead.

  • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    2028 primary election polls?

    I’m busy planning the Orlando Magic’s NBA title parade, while we’re worrying about realistic concerns.

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    AOC has it all. She’s progressive, well educated, from a humble background, intelligent and good looking. I am rooting for her but I don’t expect the Democratic Party to have a fair primary for that Senate seat.

    • zanyllama52@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve never voted for anyone because the are considered “good looking”. What a shallow approach to politics.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Was nodding along until you commented on a politician’s appearance….

      • warbond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        JFK has entered the chat.

        In the first televised presidential debate in 1960, radio listeners said that Nixon won, but TV viewers thought he looked thin and sallow compared to Kennedy’s youthful vigor and gave JFK the edge.

        Appearance has played a big role in politics ever since.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unless you haven’t lived in the real world, you’d know that -like it or not- looks also matter, and right now we need all the matter we can get

        • Opi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It matters more for a women, men are allowed to be ugly.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            It matters for men too, though I’ll agree it matters more for women

            I’m not saying this is a good thing, I’m saying this is how it is because it’s how humans are wired. Like it or not, subconsciously you’ll like pretty people better

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think they meant that in the sense that charisma is a practical tool to get elected and to get your message across, not that they want to see more hotties on CSPAN.

        Like the other reply said, it’s unfortunate that it’s a significant factor, but here it is.

      • Jikim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s the unfortunate reality in American politics, especially for someone from a minority group

  • sasquatch7704@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone should tell the Boomers that it’s time for them to get out of politics and let the younger ones replace them.

  • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    My hope is that more “quiet Democrats” get primary’d. Usually they would say “don’t primary me, you’ll risk losing us to the Republican candidate in the general and we have a moderate agenda that’s the lesser evil”.

    Right now they don’t have an agenda at all, no rudder, no direction. This is the time to primary tf out of the old Dems.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember a time when the United States actually took a break from reporting on elections instead of manufacturing hype for four solid years between major elections.

      The current political media landscape is exhausting, and I’m so sorry to everyone who is young enough to think that constant election projections are “normal.”

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Multiple 24hr all-news channels + produced as an entertainment & engagement product + people thinking that what smart informed people do is watch the news channel all the damned time. It all adds up to this crap we have today.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Schumer has already started cozying up to the most important election lobby.

    Israel.

    Activate AIPAC

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. I’ll never forgive that simpering, cowardly, weak, spineless bitch for stabbing Al Franken in the back. He should quit while has a chance to do it without looking too bad, but if he won’t, she should run him out in embarrassing and humiliating fashion.

    AOC got into Congress by beating the #4 Democratic Congressional leader in the primary, now she’s poised to beat the top Senate Democrat in the primary. She’s an actual giant killer. All other Democrats should take note - it’s not her politics that people are responding to, it’s her strength. We need people who aren’t afraid to stand up to the Nazis, and she is fearless.

    • KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is her politics and her strength, and Also her transparency and her target demographic. She represents the people - not the big corporations, even the corporations that favor Democrats. She’s here for the 99%, and to help her people, she is willing to take from the top 1% that never should have the money they possess.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I shouldn’t have made it sound like her brand of politics isnt important. I also heavily agree with her politics.

        There are others who have the same ideals, but they arent considered the leaders of the young progressives, and Bernie’s heir apparent. The reason she is out front is because she has never been afraid to get in people’s faces when they come after her. They demonized Hillary for 30 years, and in the end it was what blocked her path to the White House. AOC isn’t going to let them do the same thing to her.

        Her Politics of the People make us trust her, but its her relentless strength that makes us want her to lead us. That will only increase as she spends time in the Senate, and we see her grow. It would be great to see her in the presidency in her 30s, but she’ll do a better job in her more-experienced 40s.

        If America lasts that long.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just want her to run for president. But after fielding 2 uninspiring establishment centre-right candidates with no grassroots base, that offer nothing exciting, the Democrats and even many voters think that women in general are unelectable.

      • lumony
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah. Democrats chose to run some of the worst candidates in history.

        It’s sad that now a female candidate guarantees a trump victory. Nominating conservative female candidates did more harm than good.

      • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I just don’t think very highly of Americans in general. They are too sexist, too racist, and too elitist.

        They want a rich old white man. Only one time ever did they attempt something else, and that lead directly to a third of the country becoming extremists.

        I love AOC. Hope she will become president one day. But please just run with someone that your sexist, racist, elitist neighbors can actually vote for.

        Let AOC become Senate majority leader first. That would be really cool, impactful, and help people get used to her.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          AOC is having a fucking moment, so naturally women of color suddenly can’t win. Sanders got raked over the coals for just being accused of saying something like that to Warren. But it’s sure different now that the party can’t use it as a weapon against a progressive. Now they’re trying to keep AOC from running. So the party will hold back all women in order to hold back one progressive woman.

          Let AOC become Senate majority leader first. That would be really cool, impactful, and help people get used to her.

          It will give us time to think of a new excuse.

          • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            How is it sudden? Trump won both times you tried running women as president. Your fellow countrymen are bigots, have you not noticed that yet?

            I know you want it, its fine. But the world cant take 4 extra years of whoever heritage chooses to dismantle democracy for them, if i happen to be right.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              How is it sudden?

              Because there’s speculation that AOC might run.

              Trump won both times you tried running women as president.

              Trump won both times we ran uninspiring centrist women for president. AOC is neither uninspiring nor centrist.

              Your fellow countrymen are bigots, have you not noticed that yet?

              The ones you want to impress certainly are.

              • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                You have 50mil eligible voters who haven’t even registered. You have another 40 million registered voters that didn’t bother to show.

                I agree with you that AOC is the best bet America has for a better future. But the important thing is not getting the best outcome, the important thing is actually beating the Nazis.

                Are you willing to bet the future of the free world that you are right? I simply don’t have enough faith in the American people. You keep disappointing.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  You have 50mil eligible voters who haven’t even registered. You have another 40 million registered voters that didn’t bother to show.

                  Yes, voter apathy is a problem. Running uninspiring candidates isn’t going to fix apathy; it will make apathy much worse.

                  I agree with you that AOC is the best bet America has for a better future. But the important thing is not getting the best outcome, the important thing is actually beating the Nazis.

                  Ain’t seein’ much evidence of anyone else actually willing to oppose nazis in any way.

                  Are you willing to bet the future of the free world that you are right?

                  The last 3 elections have been against trump. We ran dull “not trump, I guess” candidates in all three. Biden only barely squeaked in and then spent four years demonstrating that democrats don’t keep their promises to anyone not named netanyahu.

                  If you have a more charismatic candidate than AOC, a white (conservative, naturally, since that’s all this is really about) male, name him.

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’d LOVE to see AOC as president, but I think this post is sopt on perfect. I think she could do some amazing good as Senate Minority, and eventually Majority Leader, and become president a bit later in life.

          Gerald Ford was once addressing a classroom, and one of the kids asked him if a woman would ever be President, and he said that a woman would definitely be president someday, but the first woman president wouldnt be directly elected. He thought the first woman president would be a vice president, who gets promoted when the president dies. After that, a woman wouldn’t have a problem getting elected. I thought that was a pretty insightful read on the weird bigotry of Americans.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nah I vehemently disagree with this. The racist sexist bigots aren’t going to vote democrat no matter what. Kamala spent a lot of time trying to court the “”“moderate”" republicans and it didn’t work.

          Obama won because he had a base and he got people excited. People still remember “Yes we can” and just the general hope and inspiration he brought.

          And honestly to even suggest the radicalisation of the right was due to Obama is crazy.

          • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            The racist sexist bigots aren’t going to vote democrat no matter what.

            Don’t make the mistake of thinking that racism and especially sexism don’t exist within the Democratic voting base. They are much less of a problem than within the Republican voting base, but they are still significant enough to swing elections.

            And honestly to even suggest the radicalisation of the right was due to Obama is crazy.

            Not solely due to Obama, but his existence in the White House did get a lot of people to take off their masks.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s why he needs to resign now, so she can navigate whatever mechanism NY has to replace him (special election or governnor appointment). He might as well quit now, he has no coherent plan to resist the Nazis for the next 3 years, just appeasement and capitulation. Get out of the way and let someone who wants to do the job have a crack at it.