• apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is huge. It seems criminal for banks to charge you up to $50 when you may not even have that in your account.

    34% of Canadians getting slapped with one of these fees in 2023 is bonkers. That’s like $50 million in fees taken from the people who are least able to afford it.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        I like both of these ideas.

        I’m reminded of a radio interview with, I believe, an RBC rep a couple decades ago. They were asked about their various fees and why they kept them as they were so unpopular with their customers. The response was along the lines of, “Well, it’s only a small part of our revenue.” I was sort of thinking, “What, so you can’t think of a reason, either?!”

  • CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s amazing! I remember being broke and being hit by NSF. It was downright devastating. $40 or $50 is a lot when you have no money.

  • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Can anyone explain what risk or labour is involved in an NSF incident and how that’s even worth $10?

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s 100% automatic and electronically based. The marginal cost of processing any NSF is quite literally $0. Even at $10, it’s 100% profit to the banks.

  • Zerberr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    That’s good, but maybe should come sooner. I suspect there will be more NSF charges with all that bs from south