“There was an incident on the New York subway and a bunch of people got on, protesters or whatever, and said, ‘All the Zionists, get off.’ When the head of the Brooklyn Museum, who was Jewish, but the Brooklyn Museum had nothing to do with Israel or taking positions on Israel — her house is smeared in red paint. That’s antisemitism. And a lot of the slogans that people use either are or slide into antisemitism.”

“The one that bothers me the most is genocide,” Schumer added. “Genocide is described as a country or some group tries to wipe out a whole race of people, a whole nationality of people. So if Israel was not provoked and just invaded Gaza and shot at random Palestinians, Gazans, that would be genocide. That’s not what happened. In fact, the opposite happened. And Hamas is much closer to genocidal than Israel.

Schumer also sharply criticized the UN for using the term “genocide” when describing the war in Gaza. “The U.N. has been anti-Israel, antisemitically against Israel. [Daniel Patrick] Moynihan was my idol. He became famous when in 1976 [it was 1975] they tried to pass a resolution, Zionism is racism.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      One of if not the deadliest year for Palestinians in like 3 decades before they industrialized the extermination campaign.

      He chose to go forward with releasing this book knowing full well what was being planned for Gaza out in the open.

      Insane, freakishly heartless behavior from the man who refused to shut down trump’s government out of respect for the institution of government

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The one that bothers me the most is genocide,” Schumer added. “Genocide is described as a country or some group tries to wipe out a whole race of people, a whole nationality of people…

    “… and Palestinians aren’t actually people.”

    – Chuck Shumer, probably.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yup it’s time to primary him. This must be a red line, support for genocide is incompatible with democratic values.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    The very next thing the Democrats need to do is to get rid of this idiot. Hard. Like kicking him out of the party.

  • themaninblack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man fuck this guy. There is no provision in the definition for genocide that says “it doesn’t count if they fired first”. What a stupid old cunt. Get the fuck out of office Schumer, you’ve lost all moral authority and I’ve slept with your wife.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        To the defense forces:

        The Polish nation refused my efforts for a peaceful regulation of neighborly relations; instead it has appealed to weapons.

        Germans in Poland are persecuted with a bloody terror and are driven from their homes. The series of border violations, which are unbearable to a great power, prove that the Poles no longer are willing to respect the German frontier. In order to put an end to this frantic activity no other means is left to me now than to meet force with force.

        Berlin, Sept. 1, 1939 - Adolf Hitler

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Schumer has lost all his credibility, and his statements should be disregarded just as Trump’s. Actually, even more so, given that Schumer has no power to enforce what he says.

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a genocide.

        Israel's Genocide on Occupied Palestine

        Our first-hand observations of the medical and humanitarian catastrophe inflicted on Gaza are consistent with the descriptions provided by an increasing number of legal experts and organizations concluding that genocide is taking place in Gaza.

        It examines the killing of civilians, damage to and destruction of civilian infrastructure, forcible displacement, the obstruction or denial of life-saving goods and humanitarian aid, and the restriction of power supplies. It analyses Israel’s intent through this pattern of conduct and statements by Israeli decision-makers. It concludes that Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

        On 26 January 2024, the ICJ said that it was plausible that Israel had breached the Genocide Convention. As an emergency measure, it ordered Israel ensure that its army refrained from genocidal acts against Palestinians.

        The ICJ reported, as part of its decisions in March and May, that the situation in Gaza had deteriorated and that Israel had failed to abide by its order in January.

        So, when we look at the actions taken, the dropping of thousands and thousands of bombs in a couple of days, including phosphorus bombs, as we heard, on one of the most densely populated areas around the world, together with these proclamations of intent, this indeed constitutes genocidal killing, which is the first act, according to the convention, of genocide. And Israel, I must say, is also perpetrating act number two and three — that is, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and creating condition designed to bring about the destruction of the group by cutting off water, food, supply of energy, bombing hospitals, ordering the fast evictions of hospitals, which the World Health Organization has declared to be, quote, “a death sentence.” So, we’re seeing the combination of genocidal acts with special intent. This is indeed a textbook case of genocide.

        More than 800 scholars of international law and genocide have signed a public statement arguing that the Israeli military may be committing genocidal acts against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip as the total siege and relentless airstrikes continue to inflict devastation on the occupied territory.

        An independent United Nations expert warned Monday that “Israel’s genocidal violence risks leaking out of Gaza and into the occupied Palestinian territory as a whole” as Western governments, corporations, and other institutions keep up their support for the Israeli military, which stands accused of grave war crimes in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.

        Our documentation encompasses over 500 incitements of violence and genocidal incitement, appearing in the forms of social media posts, television interviews, and official statements from Israeli politicians, army personnel, journalists, and other influential personalities.

        I, Lee Mordechai, a historian by profession and an Israeli citizen, bear witness in this document to the situation in Gaza as events are unfolding. The enormous amount of evidence I have seen, much of it referenced later in this document, has been enough for me to believe that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian population in Gaza. I explain why I chose to use the term below. Israel’s campaign is ostensibly its reaction to the Hamas massacre of Oct. 7, 2023, in which war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed within the context of the longstanding conflict between Israelis and Palestinians that can be dated back to 1917 or 1948 (or other dates). In all cases, historical grievances and atrocities do not justify additional atrocities in the present. Therefore, I consider Israel’s response to Hamas’ actions on Oct. 7 utterly disproportionate and criminal.

        Others: AP News, Time, Reuters, Vox, CBC

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is genocide, but when innocent civilians are being killed indiscriminately by the tens of thousands (and injured by the hundreds of thousands) by people who refer to them as “animals” and state very clearly their intent to “eradicate” them, I don’t really give a shit what it’s called. Unacceptable is what it is.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The definition is “in whole or in part.”

        Hitler also didn’t eliminate all of the Jews. You gonna engage in Holocaust denial, too?