Summary

A federal judge warned the Trump administration for defying a court order by placing reinstated probationary (new) workers on paid administrative leave instead of returning them to their jobs.

Judge William Alsup ruled that the administration’s mass firings of nearly 25,000 workers were illegal and ordered their reinstatement.

The White House argued that full reinstatement would create “significant confusion.” The American Federation of Government Employees and other unions sued, claiming the firings bypassed congressional authority.

Alsup gave the administration until Tuesday to explain its actions.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I don’t remember the Constitution defining “slamming” as part of the system of checks and balances.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      People mention the media, but everyone forgets that being “on blast” is the 4th Pillar of Democracy…

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The White House argued that full reinstatement would create “significant confusion.”

    Well, then maybe think about the legality before you do something next time. Yes, that was advice for someone who is smart and sane so will not be reflected in future decision making.

  • WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t know how many times I’ve made this comment but it feels like a lot. The more you use a word the less it means something. How unoriginal do you have to be at writing headlines in 2025 to use a word as meek as “slams.”

    It’s laughable in this context especially. Trying to phrase it like this guy has gotten any kind of consequence for his toddler-from-hell persona.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    A federal judge warned the Trump administration for defying a court order by placing reinstated probationary (new) workers on paid administrative leave instead of returning them to their jobs.

    Setting aside the question of legality, I think that it’s pretty difficult for Trump to make his case on political grounds. Trump’s provided political justification is that he’s trying to save money. I think that it’s pretty difficult to argue that paying workers to do nothing is more cost-effective than paying them to do their job.

    • courageousstep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      We know at this point that the real motivation for these firings is not to save money. It’s to reduce friction as he becomes a dictator. The more gears the government has turning, the more spots there are that can jam up the system in protest. That’s my theory, anyway. I’m sure there are additional reasons.