TehBamski@lemmy.world to Awful Taste But Great Execution@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoATBGE: Retail Store Cake?i.imgur.comimagemessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down12
arrow-up1178arrow-down1imageATBGE: Retail Store Cake?i.imgur.comTehBamski@lemmy.world to Awful Taste But Great Execution@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squareBoomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·3 months agoI’d rather eat a real Ross price label than all that fondant
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-23 months agoFondant: Art First, Taste Secondary©
minus-squarejqubed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoMy wife used to own a bakery and always said you’re not actually supposed to eat the fondant. It is “edible” but she recommended treating it like a decorative wrapping paper.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoHmm. Than why not just actual paper or similar? That’s a lot of sugar to throw away.
minus-squarePlease_Do_Not@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoToo be fair it’s less fondant than a lot of aesthetics-first cakes purely because it isn’t 100% coated in a base layer. But yeah, agreed.
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoat least the label would be edible
I’d rather eat a real Ross price label than all that fondant
Fondant:
Art First, Taste Secondary©
My wife used to own a bakery and always said you’re not actually supposed to eat the fondant. It is “edible” but she recommended treating it like a decorative wrapping paper.
Hmm. Than why not just actual paper or similar? That’s a lot of sugar to throw away.
Too be fair it’s less fondant than a lot of aesthetics-first cakes purely because it isn’t 100% coated in a base layer. But yeah, agreed.
at least the label would be edible