small44@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoScientists are hoping to redefine the second – here's whytheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1253arrow-down113
arrow-up1240arrow-down1external-linkScientists are hoping to redefine the second – here's whytheconversation.comsmall44@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squareradix@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoWould this affect our lives on Earth?
minus-squarekogs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoYou can now be more accurately late for work. Or your coffee is more accurately taking a long time to come out.
minus-squarescratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoIf they can predict earthquakes and eruptions more accurately, as suggested in the article, then yes for all the people who don’t die.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoI better not have to buy a new watch because of this.
Would this affect our lives on Earth?
You can now be more accurately late for work. Or your coffee is more accurately taking a long time to come out.
Relativistically.
If they can predict earthquakes and eruptions more accurately, as suggested in the article, then yes for all the people who don’t die.
I better not have to buy a new watch because of this.