According to nearly a dozen retired officers and current military lawyers, as well as scholars who teach at West Point and Annapolis, an intense if quiet debate is underway inside the U.S. military community about what orders it would be obliged to obey if President-elect Donald Trump decides to follow through on his previous warnings that he might deploy troops against what he deems domestic threats, including political enemies, dissenters and immigrants.

Archived at https://archive.is/He9O6

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    As I understand, they’re under no obligation whatsoever to obey jack shit from comrade trump if said jack shit involved orders to turn weapons on Americans on American soil.

    And such a request should come with it an immediate impeachment hearing and a tribunal to determine how many years in prison he should get.

  • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    209
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “There’s a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state. The other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”

    -Commander Adama

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      3 days ago

      The reason is that one is trained to (supposedly) keep the peace and prevent and investigate crimes. The other is trained to kill people. Military methods are incompatible with effective police work.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ironically the American military is better at it than the police are. They usually only kill someone if they were being fired at first. It’s called rules of engagement. American police have zero concept of it.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not exactly, read more US history, especially in situation when the military was called in to remove demonstrators. Look up the Bonus Army and no fucks were given even though the protestors were WW I veterans. Douglas MacArthur and George Patton were involved too. Disgusting piece of history.

          • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You know that happened over 100 years ago right? Things have changed since then. If you wanted to make a good case, then you should have brought up Kent State because that one is very valid for criticism.

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Kent State was national guard. I would have brought up something like drone strikes or the infamous “collateral murder”.

              • futatorius@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                The infamous “collateral murder” was selectively edited by Assange. And there are some very good reasons to use drone strikes, even against US citizens who are also at the time enemy combatants. And by “enemy combatant,” I mean literally that, not just someone the US president doesn’t like. I mean people who are attached to an organization such as Al-Qaida or to the military of a hostile state, taking up arms against the US or US allies. They’re as bad as Russian assets going into politics to betray the US.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump literally calls anyone who disagrees with him an “enemy of the state”, so yeah, we’re way past that.

  • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The constitution is your oath, not the president. Acknowledge that this administration is a domestic threat and deal with it.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        In their defense, they killed more terrible emperors than good ones.

        Pertinax though… I’ll never forgive them for that. Who knows how the entire world would look now if he’d been emperor for a decade or more…

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Other way around, I believe. Pertinax is commonly pointed to as one of the best potential Emperors, and I think Kyrgizion is saying that Pertinax is one of the few good ones that they killed, not one of the many terrible ones.

            STTL, Emperor Pertinax!

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        Also installed its own. All power goes both ways.

        In any case, even in US history military has been used against US citizens too. Not many things can really be new.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hopefully the US military will honor and protect the US Constitution. If key officers drank the shitty Orang Kool-Aid, then the USA will have become FUBAR (Fucked-up Beyond All Repair).

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are definitely hawks in the upper echelons of military power, but I’ve never met one who didn’t hold the ideals of the United States as sacred.

      I believe they will stand against tyranny. At first.

      Then they will be replaced, made examples of, forced into retirement, and violently removed. If history is any indication.

      I’m no military or historical expert, but I do believe if we’re counting on our military to save the country it is already lost.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is an important step in establishing a police state, which will be crucial for when trump doesn’t want to end his term peacefully.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s got four years to shake any of the disloyalty out of military ranks. There is no reason at all to think he won’t be president until he dies. The other side of that, of course, is that he’s very old.

      I feel fairly certain he’s accomplished the downfall of the US, but not at all certain he has the wherewithal to follow through. The real question will be how the general population handles the passing of the baton.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wonder how many people using social media today have gone back and actually watched the beating of Rodney King.

    It is really horrifying. And VHS video recorders are the only reason the police were caught.

    • Maiq@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are countess stories like this one that never ended in riot’s. One that comes to mind is Kelly Thomas a mentally I’ll man, schizophrenic if I remember correctly. I remember Thomas cried out for his mother as they beat him to death.

      These atrocities sadly are commonplace here.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wasn’t that literally the last thing Julius Caesar did immediately before declaring himself emperor for life?

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Pompey and his allies induced the Senate to demand Caesar give up his provinces and armies in the opening days of 49 BC. Caesar refused and instead marched on Rome.

        Source: Wikipedia

        Addendum:

        The civil war ultimately led to Caesar’s becoming dictator for life (dictator perpetuo). Caesar had been appointed to a governorshipover a region that ranged from southern Gaulto Illyricum. As his term of governorship ended, the Senate ordered him to disband his army and return to Rome. As it was illegal to bring armies into the northern border of which was marked by the river Rubicon, his crossing the river under arms amounted to insurrectiontreason, and a declaration of war on the state. According to some authors, he uttered the phrase iacta alea est (“the die is cast”) before crossing.

        Source: Wikipedia

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago
          1. It was not what he did before declaring himself ‘Emperor for life’, because Caesar never declared himself Emperor.

          2. The initiation of the civil war was not because Caesar decided to deploy troops as a matter of suppressing popular dissent, but because the Senate, at the behest of the ultraconservative Cato the Younger, was hell-bent on having the reformer Caesar executed for behavior of his that the Senate had already sanctioned, and preventing the democratic popular assemblies from saving him.

          3. Caesar, quite famously, did not repress his political enemies, even during the civil war; those political enemies who remained in territory he controlled were left unharmed and unimpeded; those who fought against him were unconditionally pardoned. Many of them went on to stab him several years later, so it’s not like he was pardoning just the harmless ones.

          4. Caesar’s appointment as dictator in perpetuity was not preceded by military crackdowns.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I hope Trump is dumb enough to spend years hollowing the military out instead of doing the easy things. All he has to do in red states is convince the governors to use their National Guard. If they’re under state orders there’s no legal conflict. And in blue states he could start giving badges to the Proud Boys or whoever, (literally anyone willing to do his bidding) and set them loose as federal agents.

    What the old officer corps is really afraid of here is the destruction of military norms and institutions.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s also the police that are basically ready to go now. I wonder how ham the military would let the police and brown shirts go before stepping in. I’m guessing very very ham.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yup, they’d make temporary on base housing available to soldiers who normally live off base to keep them away from the police in that case. But for the most part the attitude would be, “not my lane, not my problem.”

        Also, just to be clear, that temporary housing would be permanent. In the best tradition of governments everywhere.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      End of the line yes. This is no longer something that is recoverable within a single generation. There’s some hope that our grandchildren or thereabouts can put things right, but I’m halfway through (40’s) and I fully expect every year after this to get objectively worse until I die.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    On the plus side, it would be the first time in several decades the military is deployed in a terrorist rogue state

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      I seriously wonder whether this is the real reason they are putting so much effort into keeping the Classified Documents case report totally secret, without even disclosing it to Congress.

      As absurd as the thought that the US military would rise up and depose a duly elected President is, ask yourself under what circumstances might it happen? Perhaps it would happen if it came out that there was incontrovertible proof that duly elected President sold that military’s secrets to foreign parties (or, worse yet, freely gave them away in exchange for compliments, and plauditudes.) And that two (possibly all three) branches of government refuse to do anything about it.

      It’s not the most absurd conspiracy theory I’ve heard.