• SanctimoniousApe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    After all the advances we have made as a species, why haven’t we found a way to rid ourselves of scummy people like this? There’s just SO MANY of them, and they ruin EVERYTHING!

  • adhocfungus@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe I missed it, but were there any consequences for filing the SLAPP? The suit was tossed, which is a good start, but then what? The article made it sound like California has anti-SLAPP laws, but were they applied here?

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah. They said it’s now righted the wrong, but I don’t think so.

      Usually, the anti-SLAPP statute specifies that the SLAPPing party needs to pay the defendant’s legal fees, but in this case they were represented pro bono by a high-profile attorney, so maybe that’s the only remedy and it just didn’t apply.