• @gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    197 hours ago

    Honestly I’m starting to hate this narrative

    For one, by far the most polluting companies are state owned coal companies in China and India. Then other state owned fossil fuel companies and then private fossil fuel companies.

    So all those companies are just lower generation. So it’s not like they can just stop, people need the electricity.

    And it’s not like nothing is being done either. Like by far the biggest polluter is China’s coal industry, making up 25% of global emissions, but China is also THE global leader on clean energy investment. They are currently building more nuclear power plants than the entire rest of the world has, they are making the biggest most powerfull wind turbines in the world, etc.

    And if people would stop consuming cheap, disposable shite from China, then they wouldn’t use so much electricity, so would burn less coal and also you wouldn’t make a bunch of shit that’s just going to end up in a landfill.

    • Track_ShovelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      217 hours ago

      It’s a multifaceted issue, but don’t kid yourself

      http://amp.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change.

      China weighs in at 14.5% for coal. Another 1-point-some-odd for their Petro Chem. The issue is that there are a lot of companies that make up the remainder.

      Demand definitely plays a role in all of this, but I don’t think pushing green initiatives is a bad thing from the consumers and one of the only ways we can encourage these companies to do their part

      • @TheColonel@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        15 hours ago

        It’s possible there’s a very specific tinge of racism and/or jingoism present in the comment previous to yours.

        Multinational companies are to blame, not just India and China.

        • @Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          25 hours ago

          Really? I didn’t see the racist overtones you did apparently. I read that as ‘China is the largest pollution source, but only because of X Y and Z, and they’re doing more to mitigate it than anyone else’.

          • @TheColonel@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            23 hours ago

            I hear your point there, you’re not wrong, but it does lay the blame at their feet then sort of back away from the stance.

            The fact is, most people won’t read it all. They’re just going to see “blame India and China!”

            “Phew, at least I’m off the hook.”

            I don’t even like to admit the idea of the above but based on the last month (and let’s face it, very long time before that), people are willing to jump to all sorts of conclusions.

            Hell, maybe I did about it sounding racist! But I don’t know the intent behind every message I read. I’m just feeling very skeptical and cautious.

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    159 hours ago

    This always gets me. They are producing stuff that we the people buy. They aren’t out there just for the fun of things. Inb4 Lemmy’s famous misreadings, yes it is an issue, yes we need regulation (which we will have to start again from scratch, hopefully in 4 years), yes we need renewables. But this simplistic “it’s just 100 companies” is misleading AF.

    • Those 100 companies have made it so it’s incredibly difficult not to buy from them.

      Groceries? There’s like 10 companies that own all of the food supply. Good luck figuring out which one’s have child labor, and a horrendous environmental impact. They’ve very purposely masked that image.

      Oh wow, everything is recyclable! No, those companies just slapped that logo on all of their products so we can ignorantly wish-cycle their garbage. Most of it ends up in the landfill.

      Don’t want a car? Our cities are very deliberately designed to require cars. There is a very strong private agenda against good public transportation.

      Then there’s the pollution. These companies pollute so much more than we know. Whether that’s dumping forever chemicals into our water, or taking private jets everywhere. It’s not like the label on your T-shirt tells you that.

      Finally find a good company? They’ll buy it up, lobby against it, or coerce them out of business. Just look how many companies Luxottica has destroyed.

      There’s layer after layer of obfuscation to hide what these companies are doing. It’s not just a matter of picking Product A over Product B. We rarely have much choice, or the information to make better choices.

      • @IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        57 hours ago

        I think the idea was “reduce consumption”. As a society we buy tons of stuff, way more than 50 or 100 years ago.

      • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -9
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        You seem like you have a consumption problem. Outside of a car, heating, and cooling nobody is forcing anything down your throat.

        You choose and desire to buy whatever product you’re talking about.

  • Sixty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 hours ago

    Humans self describe as intelligent. That always stuck with me.

    • @oo1
      link
      English
      48 hours ago

      Humans are so naturally stupid that they almost make AI seem intelligent.

    • @WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      That’s the best part! You can’t!

      Thanks to the consolidation and vertical integration of the largest multinationals, as long as you choose to live — no matter how careful and conscious your purchases — a significant proportion of it will still funnel to most of these corporations.

        • @trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          96 hours ago

          Food, shelter, hygiene prodcuts, clothes, furniture, fucking everything.

          Yes, some of these things aren’t technically necessary but you did include phone and a car, so I am assuming we’re not just talking about base subsistence.

          Unless you become a cave hermit or somehow manage to source everything from self employed artisans and cooperatives (and vet their material sources), you will support corporations even if you try to reduce your consumption as much as possible.

          Pretty much all industries have been captured by massive corporations at this point, and vetting all companies and their supply lines is literally not possible to do.

          Think with your head instead of just saying what feels right for once, please.

          • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -4
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I buy my food locally. I buy my clothes local to my state. Furniture is made locally. All my hygiene but my conditioner is local. I generate more electricity than I use. But there you go, that’s all corporate

            It’s just easier to buy corporate. Literally nothing you have stated needs to feed corporations. 100% bullshit.

            • That’s all neat but there’s a few problems with advocating this approach as a solution to anything.

              1. The supply chain problem mentioned by the other reply to your comment.

              2. The economic viability for this approach from both the side of supply and demand.

              Local, especially “ethically” produced goods are usually much more expensive, and when people are barely making ends meet.

              It’s also much harder to expand a business that sources their goods “ethically” and so on.

              1. This is just not a solution. It’s an individualistic approach to an institutional problem.

              Companies are largely not accountable, there is largely no economic democracy (vote with your dollar doesn’t count), and increasingly all matters of government are once again captured by large corporations and wealthy individuals.

              The solution here cannot be to just consume better, something needs to change drastically.

            • y0kai
              link
              fedilink
              English
              54 hours ago

              Where do the local farmers get their tractors and tools? Where does the fabric, dye, looms, sewing machines etc. for clothing come from? Where does the furniture maker buy his tools and who makes them? Are your solar panels homemade? What does that electricity power?

              Whether directly or not, some portion of the money we spend will end up in the hands of these corporations, even if it just means you paid the furniture guy for a chair and he used that money to buy his kids mcdonalds. And while it’s great that you sound like you’re actively trying to live in a sustainable way, I don’t think you get to deny that if you’re a part of the economy you’re still supporting corporations, simply due to the sheer depth and breadth of these companies.

            • @UsernameHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              45 hours ago

              I don’t have the option to buy any of those things locally. Just because you can doesn’t mean it is viable for anyone else.

        • @UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          Clothing, food, shelter, software, electronics, medicine, fuel, consumable goods like batteries and much much more. These are just off the top of my head.

          • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            See my other comment. Bullshit beyond the medicine, healthcare is fucked for sure. Oh and the $20 of rechargeable batteries. Real corpo bullshit buying a pack of AAA or Samsung batteries every 4 or 5 years.

  • TurboWafflz
    link
    fedilink
    39 hours ago

    Well clearly it’s the fault of everyone noticing the problems because like 100 years ago no one noticed the problems and so clearly they weren’t happening because no one noticed and if they were happening someone would have noticed so if people just hadn’t noticed they never would have happened and then no one would have noticed them which of course then means they double wouldn’t have happened

    It’s just common sense if you think about it from that perspective