• @the_tab_key@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 hours ago

    Even if the x-x term didn’t exist, the equation is already simplified (fully factored) so there is nothing to do anyway.

  • LostXOR
    link
    fedilink
    2414 hours ago

    Fun fact, omitting the (x-x) zero term and expanding the entire polynomial, you’d get something with 2^25 = 33,554,432 terms. May be slightly excessive!

  • GreyBeard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1301 day ago

    For those of you who were confused even after reading the comments: (a)(b) basically means a*b. My mind just didn’t connect that to the fact that (x-x)=0. in the (a-x)(b-x) stuff is also (x-x) which = 0, and anything * 0 = 0, so no matter the value of literally everything else in the equation, it all equals out to 0 because every single () will get multiplied by (x-x), which is 0. There, hopefully that will clear it up for anyone remaining lost. And like all good jokes, they are always best when you have to explain them.

      • GreyBeard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 hours ago

        To expand on what superkret said, in math there is the concept of “order of operations”. That is to say, every function in math (add, multiply, divide) has to be done in a specific order. Since multiplication comes before addition and subtraction, if you have a formula like a-xb-x, you will do xb first, then a minus the result of x*b, which would give a very different result than if you did a-x and multiplied that by b-x. This is where the parenthesis come in. You are basically saying, resolve every section in parenthesis first using the proper order, then resolve the rest.

        My original example (a)(b) was over simplified, because there is no conflict there. You can also do things like (ax)-(bx). If there is no operator though, it is assumed multiplication, and I’m unsure why that is.

      • @superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 hours ago

        To make sure what’s inside the brackets is resolved internally before they’re multiplied with each other.

         (a)  (b)   =   a * b  
        (a+1)(b+1) =/= a+1*b+1
        
  • @Saganaki@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    791 day ago

    For those that struggled like me…

    Going from a-z, write out the last three multiplicands.

      • @copd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Technically there is a (x - 𝑥) in there. U+1D465 != x so this post is a little meh

        • @MBM
          link
          English
          67 hours ago

          Mathematicians do weird stuff to get more letters, but I’ve never seen anyone use x and 𝑥 for different things

          • @joshthewaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 hours ago

            They also wouldn’t want to be ambiguous. If I was trying to write this problem the a, b, c… would get replaced by something like a_1, a_2,…, a_26 to be clearer. This problem works as a fun gotcha but isn’t something that would come up in the real world.