Ah, yes. Hi Doggy, Those Feratu, and El Wiwi.

Just like Renesmee!

I see what you’re going for re: automation, but calling this a genocide seems weird to me. Then scaling down cattle farming would also be genocide. There’s no horse culture that got eradicated, just less breeding.

What’s with the gas mask?

The trick is to never mark your messages as read

Along those lines: it also only shows the sidebar of the first community

This is why women get accused of being unfair debaters.

You don’t have to be “fair” when some rando starts debating you out of nowhere, same way you don’t have to do a proper duel when someone asks

I suddenly understand the Simpsons joke. Cool track.

Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere.

it’s AI

Looks a lot larger than A1 tbh

That looks way too smooth, and the mistakes (random white specks) are not the mistakes anyone would make in ms paint. There’s a whole art to “realistically bad” art. The kinds of mistakes and weird details tell a specific story. (Andrew Hussie, the person who made the Sweet Bro and Hella Jeff one, has a bunch of forum posts from like 2010 talking about it)

Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive

If adding serifs to the I is bad, I think a good alternative is adding a tail to the l (like a t without the bar). Some fonts do this and I’m a huge fan.

Positive integers are (a subset of) natural numbers

Is this an old image or do people actually want to do a men’s health month in the same month as Pride?

No. It doesn’t have the Latin ending -us, but actually ends with pus (fom the Greek word for foot). From the Greek origin, the plural would be octopodes. Octopuses is more usual.

“So you’re antiemetic?”

“No, I…”

Makes sense, because you make me want to throw up

Incompleteness means that maybe it’s actually impossible to prove or disprove the Riemann hypothesis, or whether P=NP. I think that’s a big deal. Maybe the fact that there are meaningful results shown to be unprovable (like axiom of choice) is more satisfying?

For me, “imagine a circle” is kind of a meaningless instruction until you follow it up with something