• Doug [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 year ago

    Little bothered that Tim Russ said “bias” instead of “biased”

    • @usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      No, you see he is the literal human embodiment of the concept of bias and was letting us know. The other tweets are unrelated

      • Apathy Tree
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        A peeve of mine is the term “pet peeve”. 😅

        If something bothers you so, why the fuck would you keep, nurture, and tend to it as a pet?

        I propose it change to haunting peeve, because you don’t want it, can’t get rid of it, and it exists regardless if you think about it or not.

        😁 (I’m not super serious about this, but “pet peeve” really does low-key bother me)

          • Apathy Tree
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Omg you are an actual person. Every time I see your username under a post I, for whatever reason, think it’s the community name.

            I’ve seen a lot of your posts I think 😅 thanks for what you do! 🫡

            (No it didn’t register that I replied to you until I went back to look… I don’t really -see- usernames)

              • Apathy Tree
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I like that you like sharing memes, because I’ve come across them enough to think you are a community unto yourself.

                I like sorting by new to report garbage and interact with things that would otherwise die, also to help Lemmy grow! It’s lonely in new but… i get to report a lot of weird stuff… so there’s that 🫠

        • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          it’s actually short for petite peeve, because it’s something small and unimportant. Or maybe it’s not, but you don’t know.

        • ElHexo [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It’s partly a joke (your favourite peeve, for example) and probably a reference to the other, now archaic, meaning of pet:

          fit of peevishness, offense or ill-humor at feeling slighted

          I think you can accept idioms as they are or you’ll be endlessly feeling like one saying or another has got your goat

          • Apathy Tree
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You must have missed the part that says I’m not really serious.

    • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I’ve noticed that grammar error a lot on the Internet. Bias is discussed frequently as a topic of popular rage-bait posts.

      FYI for those people: “bias” is a noun that is the thing, and “biased” is an adjective that describes a person who has the bias. “The biased person showed their bias” for example.

    • JWBananas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      If you understand someone well enough to correct them, you didn’t have to.

      • Doug [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn’t mean everyone else will

        Just because you understand them well enough today doesn’t mean you will tomorrow

        We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

        • @hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn’t mean everyone else will

          Then they should ask for clarification.

          Just because you understand them well enough today doesn’t mean you will tomorrow

          At which point you can ask for clarification.

          We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

          And part of “better” is having the perspective and desire to avoid pedantry where it’s not needed.

          • Doug [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            We’re clearly not going to agree here. Plenty of people would rather be made aware of their mistakes and that’s no less valid than your point of view. Personally I would rather avoid potential misunderstandings than deal with them after the fact. I’m not the only one who feels that way.

        • JWBananas
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Just because … doesn’t mean …

          I hate this extragrammatical idiom so much.

          But given that colloquial usage trumps all else when it comes to driving the evolution of language, most people could care less.

          • Doug [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Interesting choice given the way that’s been shifting slowly back to the more accurate form in the past however many years.

            If colloquial usage did trump all, irregardless would’ve been acknowledged as a correct word well before I was born. It may be the driving force but it’s hardly the only, or even constantly deciding, factor

    • @CeruleanRuin
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      For people over a certain age I always assume they’re using text to speech and don’t worry about going back and correcting it. My wife is somehow always talking to someone else in the room while she dictates to her watch, so I have a lot of fun interpreting her texts.

    • @merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah, what’s the deal with that. Yes, the two sound similar, but saying “I’m bias” is like saying “I’m anger” instead of “I’m angry” or “I’m sadness” instead of “I’m sad”.

      • Doug [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        It’s like the “would of” people. They don’t hear it in speech so they type it how it sounds to them.

        Or it’s autocorrect

    • theodewere
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      only because it makes him look like he learned to read on tumblr

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    501 year ago

    Unrelated to Trek, one of my favorite Twitch streams was watching AOC play Among Us with Ilhan Omar, Canadian MP Jagmeet Singh, and a bunch of YouTubers like Jack Septiceye and ContraPoints. The way Omar would giggle every time she killed somebody was adorable.

  • Alien Nathan Edward
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    Janeway leads with focus on her mission - to get her crew home

    I don’t believe that AOC has seen more than about three episodes of Voyager. If she had seen at least three, the statistical likelihood that she would have seen one where Janeway yanks the crew into some conflict they have absolutely no business involving themselves in would approach 100%

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    Remember this cool stuff? Now it’s just a fascist site with RW morons trying to out-nazi each other.

  • @WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    By Trek’s logic, Tuvix’s identical copy lives in an alternative universe of some sort. And that’s really the only way to justify all this.

    Ed: Also the “Oh wait, they can’t speak so someone has to speak for them” has some interesting implications, doesn’t it.

      • Aa!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Considering Mirror Tuvok was still on Terok Nor, I would love to see how they explain that one

        • @Damage@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          He’s not originally from the mirror universe, but since he is an asshole version, he naturally ended up in the asshole universe

    • PaleRider
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Surely they also have a copy of his pattern in the transporter buffer.

      • theodewere
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        that pattern buffer is a plot hole big enough to show a Klingon Battle Cruiser a good time

    • @CeruleanRuin
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Trek has no true multiverse in the modern sense of the concept. It’s more of a single-timeline with occasional aberrations. It has the occasional “alternate timeline”, but almost always uses the concept that those are temporary and collapse once the “real” timeline is restored - unless some important event or other metaphysical technobabble causes them to remain stable.

      The only major examples of timelines that didn’t seem to vanish after the protagonists had left are the Mirror Universe and the Kelvin Timeline. There are little pocket loops here and there, but by and large it seems that there is One True Timeline that can be reshaped, but doesn’t branch endlessly.

      That said, you gotta figure that the Mirror Universe version of Tuvix got wind of the plan to split him in half and did some splitting of his own.

        • @5C5C5C@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Mirror universe Janeway would use the caretaker technology to conquer the Delta Quadrant and become the Borg queen without even being assimilated.

        • @CeruleanRuin
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Apparently there’s a comic or novel where MU Janeway is the “pirate queen of the Delta Quadrant”, so you’re not far off.

    • axont [comrade/them, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thomas Riker was created through a complete freak accident involving a distortion field that reflected a transporter beam in the exact right way to duplicate Will Riker. It’s not something that be done easily at will.

      Now cloning and memory implantation are completely possible as well, like that one TNG episode where they make a clone of Kahless or that one very dumb ENT episode where there’s a clone of Trip. I’m not sure, but cloning is probably illegal by the time of Voyager, since genetic augmentation is completely illegal throughout the Federation.

      But the main problem is that nothing other than killing Tuvix would have satiated Janeway’s bloodlust. For real, she’s like the most evil person in that entire show.

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    see now that is what the social medias are actually good for

  • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    The fact that it is still widely discussed even after so many years, proves is such a great episode with a great moral dilemma.

    Whether they chose is the right choice or not, I can not say.

    But from a story perspective, all I can say is that I didn’t really like the character of Tuvix, too whiney and weird. While Neelix may not be everyone’s favourite, Tuvok definitely was an excellent addition to the team. So for my enjoyment, they did make the right choice.

    • @cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      Further to the link. Tuvix is a character in star trek voyager. There is a transporter accident that ends up welding 2 other characters (Lieutenant Tuvok, Neelix) into 1 individual. The episode is spent trying to resolve this issue.

      By the end, Captain Janeway is given a solution. They can reverse the process and recover Tuvok and Neelix. Unfortunately this will destroy Tuvix. Tuvix, meanwhile has developed on his own. He doesn’t want to die and makes that clear. Janeway has the dilemma. She can do nothing, and let Tuvix live, or kill him to bring Tuvok and Neelix back.

      Basically, it’s the trolley problem. Do nothing, and 2 people die, or kill 1 yourself, to save them.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        What I don’t get is why they didn’t do some technofoolery with the transporters to make a copy of Tuvix and then just split that one. In a universe where there’s two William Rikers there’s gotta be a way to use transporters to clone.

        • Alien Nathan Edward
          link
          fedilink
          English
          331 year ago

          You kinda have to accept the bounds of the problem as stated in order for it to be worth thinking about. It undercuts the value of the experiment if you just say “I find a solution other than those presented which denied the central conflict entirely”.

        • @Kahlenar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          Then you’d have two Tuvixes that both don’t want to die. Actually I had an entire day of one philosophy class to discuss this, however it was very specific that “teletransportation” absolutely kills you and replicates you. My professor specifically said that having an understanding of star trek was necessary that day.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Just keep one in the transporter buffer and repolarize the Heisenberg compensator to split it apart before materialization. It wouldn’t ever know it existed. Like unzipping a file in a temporary directory.

        • Osa-Eris-Xero512
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          There’s not supposed to be. Every time a transporter clone happens it’s due to external and uncontrollable factors.

            • Doug [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Not really. The Doctor wasn’t really as advanced as chat gpt. Just an emergency tool. Voyager was stranded without a doctor so they used it full time and he grew sentience along the way.

        • @CeruleanRuin
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          My personal headcanon is that they would have had they had the full resources of Starfleet at their disposal. The Riker incident was, as far as we know, non-reproducible, or someone somewhere would have found a way to weaponize it.

        • @HairHeel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Terrible idea. Any time a transporter duplicates somebody, one of them turns evil. (See the DS9 episode where Tom Riker pretends to be Will Riker and hijacks the Defiant, or the reason Harry Kim, who was replaced by his own duplicate early on in the series, never got a promotion).

          So now you have to decide to kill Good Tuvix, or kill the other one, which will just give you Evil Tuvok and Evil Neelix.

  • @CeruleanRuin
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Has anyone ever asked Tom Wright what he thinks about it?

  • ElHexo [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Janeway is a blood-crazed necromancer who obviously lept at the opportunity to kill someone to bring two people back

    Good thing they had an organ printer otherwise she’d be chopping people up for their kidneys