• Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      So, why do some blue states want to continueusing FPTP voting? Why continue using a voting system favored by Republicans? In states controlled by Democrats, there’s no Republican opposition hindering electoral reform efforts.

      FPTP favors whichever party is currently in power in a two party system. Solid blue states don’t want to switch because it makes their hold on power less secure. Same reason as Republicans in red states.

    • @MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      You’re factually correct, and I support your long term goal, but it’s not something we can achieve by November.

      • @chaonaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        I swear I hear this regardless of how close we are to the next presidential election. Can we maybe focus on some of the other races on the ballot? I would love if we could get a Congress that was actually able to make good things happen, instead of trying very hard to do nothing so bad things don’t happen.

        • @barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          Congress might also have been able to get more done if there was a filibuster-proof majority for more than several months in the last several decades.

          I do vote for the most progressive person available in the primaries tho.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            The fact that we even need a filibuster proof majority to get anything done is yet another glaring example of how fucked we are.

          • @chaonaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            Yeah, the focus on winning the presidency ignores the down ballot, small market and “off-cycle” races, and, to get to fillibuster-proof majorities, those races are the ones that need to be won. Berating progressives in urban areas to vote for moderate liberal candidates for president is not exactly harm reduction.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Sorry, media is now handled at the national level so covering local and state races outside of ones that get clicks isn’t profitable

          • @chaonaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            Oh, good! Is it also owned by large corporations who have interests that cause them to favor certain stories because it impacts their bottom line and the editorial desk does not have strong independence from the business side of things because of a monoculture of publishers? Surely, this will bring us a wide variety of political candidates and not an endless parade of arch-capitalists and fascists who give kickbacks to corporations!

    • @FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Electoral systems is a pretty nerdy topic (despite how important it is for who gets power), so it is not an issue the typical voter cares for. Therefore there is not enough political capital for such large reforms to be taken on by politicians.

      • @knexcar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Based on the about of Lemmy comments advocating for it, it seems like the typical voter is pretty passionate about ranked choice voting.